Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Goldbereis Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
0156% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Religion$92kEducation$57kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$7,275
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS 5000$26,388
BAIS YAAKOV DRAV MEIR$8,750
BNOS MELECH$7,275
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ORCHOS CHAIM$4,650
CHEDER TORAS ZEV$4,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 73% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%TALMUDICAL YESHIVA PHILA: $10k → 22%MESIFTA OF LONG BEACH: $3k → 6%KAHAL BAIS YITZCHOK: $5k → 20%BNOS MELECH: $11k → 11%YAGDIL TORAH: $3k → 20%LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $10k → 11%KAHAL BAIS YICCHOK: $5k → 20%BNOS MELECH: $7k → 11%VARIOUS 5000: $70k → 20%ORCHOS CHAIM: $7k → 11%VARIOUS 5000: $49k → 20%LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $7k → 11%VARIOUS 5000: $36k → 20%ORCHOS CHAIM: $7k → 11%VARIOUS 5000: $26k → 20%CHEDER TORAS ZEV: $6k → 11%CONG CHAKAL YITZCHOK: $2k → 20%ORCHOS CHAIM: $6k → 11%BAIS YAAKOV DRAV MEIR: $15k → 20%CHEDER BNEI TORAH: $6k → 11%BAIS YAACOV D'RAV MEIR: $14k → 20%BNOS MELECH: $6k → 11%BAIS YAAKOV DRAV MEIR: $10k → 20%ORCHOS CHAIM: $5k → 11%BAIS YAAKOV DRAV MEIR: $10k → 20%MEKOR HAHINUCK: $5k → 11%BAIS YAAKOV DRAV MEIR: $9k → 20%CHEDER TORAS ZEV: $4k → 11%YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN: $8k → 20%CHEDER BNAI TORAH: $4k → 11%CHAIM BERLIN: $7k → 20%BAIS TOVA: $4k → 11%YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN: $6k → 20%OHR YISSOCHOR: $3k → 11%YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN: $5k → 20%BAIS SHAINDEL: $3k → 11%YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN: $5k → 20%YESHIVA TASHBAR: $3k → 11%YESHIVA EVEN YISROEL: $2k → 11%BAIS YAAKOV OHEL ESTHER: $2k → 11%TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV: $700 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$324k · 7 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +70% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
18

Total granted

$324k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+70%

Still filing today

43%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $24k · revenue +86%
  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $17k · revenue +49%
  • CT
    CHEDER TORAS ZEV
    2× · 2019–2021 · $10k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • BY
    BAIS YAACOV D'RAV MEIR
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
2
Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc

Operation of a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
3
Masores Bnos Yisroel Inc

Masores bnos yisroel is a religious elementary school providing quality education for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
4
Bais Reuven Kamenetz of Lakewood

Educational. operation of a parochial elementary school, which provides religious and secular education to school-age children.

Education
5
Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc

Operation of a parochial elementary school, providing education services to students

Education
6
Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs

Educational-operation of private girls' high school

7
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
8
Bais Yaakov Girls High School of Minneapolis

Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.

Education
9
Bais Yaakov of Jackson Inc

Parochial high school

Education
10
Ohr Avrohom Chaim Inc

Parochial elementary school in lakewood nj

Education
11
Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc

Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
12
Mesivta Ohr Yisroel Inc

Parochial secondary school.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yagdil Torah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS 5000 — $181,288 · OtherVARIOUS 5000BAIS YAAKOV DRAV MEIR — $43,750 · OtherBAIS YAAKOV DRAV MEIRORCHOS CHAIM — $24,150 · OtherORCHOS CHAIMIndividual grant recipient — $23,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBAIS YAACOV D'RAV MEIR — $14,000 · Other+13 more — $55,500 · Other+13 moreBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC — $23,775 · EducationBNOS MELECH OF L…LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC — $16,900 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER …CHEDER TORAS ZEV — $10,300 · EducationCHEDER TORAS ZEVBAIS TOVA INC — $4,000 · EducationBAIS TOVA INCBAIS SHAINDEL — $2,500 · Education+1 more — $700 · EducationYAGDIL TORAH INC — $2,500 · Religion
Other$342,188Education$58,175Religion$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC — $23,775 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC — $16,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHEDER TORAS ZEV — $10,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS TOVA INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS SHAINDEL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAGDIL TORAH INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OHEL ESTHER INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds CHEDER TORAS ZEV
  • Who funds BAIS TOVA INC
  • Who funds BAIS SHAINDEL
  • Who funds YAGDIL TORAH INC
  • Who funds BAIS YAAKOV OHEL ESTHER INC
  • Who funds TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Fund IncNJ17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Fund Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc · Mns Foundation · Dirshu International Inc · Toras Chesed Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Goldbereis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Cheder Toras Zev22% of income from government
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc21% of income from government
  • Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc16% of income from government
  • Bais Tova Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph