Skip to content

· Private foundation

Goddard Restorative Care Unit Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2020
2
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$124kHealth$78kHuman Services$63kYouth Development$36kArts & Culture$30kHousing & Shelter$30kFood & Nutrition$25kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2020 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE BROCKTON HOSPITAL ASTHMA CAMP$25,000
BROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER-VICENTE'S MARKET$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%MY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $6k → 11%OLD COLONY YMCA: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$160k · 5 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
46

Total granted

$160k
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+136%

Still filing today

80%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COACHING FOR CHANGE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +331%
  • SO
    SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +71%
  • FB
    FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHARITY GUILD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +152%
  • HI
    HEALTH IMPERATIVES - PENELOPE'S PLACE
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • LF
    LOUIS F ANGELO SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bay State Community Services Inc

We support individuals, families, and the community with our continuum of care services with integrated, culturally competent behaviourial health, substance use recovery, and rehabilitative justice services.

—
2
Family Service Association of Greater Fall River Inc

Strengthen and support individuals and families and to address the social service needs of our diverse and changing communities.

—
3
Brockton Area Arc Inc

Brockton area arc inc will work in partnership with and for the community to provide advocacy, information and direct services that offer new opportunities and choice for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and…

Human Services
4
Homehealth & Child Care Services Inc

Committed to the healthy development,education,childcare,respectful eldercare, and to provide support & empowerment of all families of southeastern massachusetts, cape cod and the islands

—
5
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
6
Boston Community Pediatrics Inc

Boston community pediatrics (bcp) provides ambulatory pediatric and related health care services to the residents of boston, massachusetts, and surrounding communities. bcp is a new model of innovative pediatric healthcare that addresses…

Health
7
Northeast Center for Youth and Families Inc

Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.

Human Services
8
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc

The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.

Human Services
9
Massachusetts Fair Housing Center Inc

Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.

Housing & Shelter
10
North Suffolk Community Services Inc

North suffolk community services supports individuals and families across the lifespan in their pursuit of independence and stability by providing a comprehensive array of treatment and recovery services. our approach is to intervene as…

—
11
Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc

The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.

Human Services
12
Semcoa Inc Dba Southeast Massachusetts Council On Advocacy

Semcoa's mission is to advocate for and provide support to individuals, families, and communities in the areas of substance use, mental illness, domestic violence, homelessness, and parenting.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rotary Community Corps of Adult Day Health Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY COMMUNITY CORPS OF ADULT DAY HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $40,000 · OtherROTARY COMMUNITY CORPS OF ADULT DAY HEALTH PROGRAM INCSIGNATURE HEALTHCARE BROCKTON HOSPITAL ASTHMA CAMP: $25,000 · OtherSIGNATURE HEALTHCARE BROCKTON HOSPITAL ASTHMA CAMPBROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $25,000 · OtherBROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INCHEALTH IMPERATIVES - PENELOPE'S PLACE: $20,000 · OtherHEALTH IMPERATIVES - PENELOPE'S PLACELOUIS F ANGELO SCHOOL: $10,000 · Other+39 more: $117,138 · Other+39 moreCOACHING FOR CHANGE INC: $30,000 · EducationCOACHING FOR CHAN…SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $30,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEELS …SUNSHINE FARM SANCTUARY INC: $3,000 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM IN EASTON INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureFATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE CHARITY GUILD INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionOLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesMy Brothers Keeper Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesMAB COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,500 · Health
Other$237,138Education$63,000Arts & Culture$30,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Human Services$12,000Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROTARY COMMUNITY CORPS OF ADULT DAY HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $40,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM IN EASTON INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCOACHING FOR CHANGE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHARITY GUILD INC: $25,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetBROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAB COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMy Brothers Keeper Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROTARY COMMUNITY CORPS OF ADULT DAY HEALTH PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM IN EASTON INC ↗
  • Who funds COACHING FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARITY GUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds BROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAB COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds My Brothers Keeper Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Goddard Health Services IncMA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Goddard Health Services Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Harborone Foundation · North Easton Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Bluestone Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · South Shore Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · The New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Plymouth County In

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goddard Restorative Care Unit Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goddard Restorative Care Unit Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Mab Community Services Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Family and Community Resources Inc: 54% of income from government
  • Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc: 24% of income from government
  • The Charity Guild Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Brockton Neighborhood Health Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Coaching for Change Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Children's Museum in Easton Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goddard Restorative Care Unit’s filings →

More from the funding graph