· Public charity
Global Good Fund
Accelerate the development of high potential young leaders to achieve out-sized social impact.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $73,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $220,395 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $147,395 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VIRTUDENT | $9,000 |
| ABBEY GOEL & ASSOCIATES | $9,000 |
| BIOLOGIC COMMUNITY HEALTH | $5,000 |
| THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN | $5,000 |
| PRISERE LLC | $5,000 |
| SAMARITAN MINISTRY OF GREATER WASHINGTON | $5,000 |
| COZYMEAL INC | $5,000 |
| GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF EAST TEXAS INC | $5,000 |
| AFTER SCHOOL ALL STARS | $5,000 |
| CONSULT YOUR COMMUNITY INC | $5,000 |
| LAVA MAE | $5,000 |
| THE BEST BEES COMPANY | $5,000 |
| MOLLY MATTHEWS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $89k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Fellowship Funds
Stated purpose: Fellowship Funds
Stated purpose: Fellowship Funds
Stated purpose: Fellowship Funds
Stated purpose: Fellowship Funds
Stated purpose: Fellowship Funds
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SMSamaritan Ministry of Greater Washington2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +15%
- CYCONSULT YOUR COMMUNITY INC2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +66%
- AAAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- RHRECIPROCAL HEALTH INCone grant, 2018 · $20k
- CCOZYMEALINCone grant, 2018 · $15k
- VSVERA SOLUTIONSone grant, 2018 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the skill set of our local workforce and develop a resilient base of job creating entrepreneurs in Washington State by providing small businesses advisory, professional and technical assistance designed to streamline…
Promote economic self-sufficiency through comprehensive entrepreneurial training targeting low to moderate income individuals women minorities and veterans.
Through workshops, training programs and technical assistance, we help social entrepreneurs build ventures that deliver social impact.
Green Careers Texass mission is to disrupt poverty through green career training and employment, in combination with community education.By providing solar PV installation and safety training in the part of Dallas suffering the highest…
Provide education, training & services that promote positive economic mobility. Our programs & services in the Maryland and Washington, DC area assist low-to-moderate income youth & adults & include workforce training, college & career…
The WorkWell Partnership operates a four-week job training program consisting of training and counseling, with qualified trainers, mentors, and advocates helping to prepare formerly incarcerated citizens for employment that can be…
Collaboration for Good is a capacity-building organization that focuses on accelerating economic equity. We believe the road to building a just and equal society lies in normalizing and stabilizing economic equity. Decent work, economic…
We're on a mission to improve data use in the social sector by connecting capacity with need for a thriving equitable social data ecosystem.
Women Enabled Enterprises strives to help low income women of color artisans in African countries grow their craft business for self-sufficiency through a virtual, mobile-phone based, retail entrepreneurship skills building program, access…
Training and Supports for Veterans, First Responders and their Families, we specialize in entrepreneurial training but that is not the only kind of support we provide.
We provide training, coaching, community supports and access to leading colorado employers enabling coloradans to acheive economic security, mobility and prosperity.
GSF mission is to conduct practical education training programs that prepare individuals and institutions for the digital age. Our programs include workforce training initiatives with institutional partners, career & leadership tech…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Veterans Enterprise Training & Services Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lava Mae. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Samaritan Ministry of Greater Washington ↗
- Who funds CONSULT YOUR COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS ↗
- Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN ↗
- Who funds Thrive Community Health dba BioLogic ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds The Scholarship Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds The First 72 ↗
- Who funds Global Good Fund ↗
- Who funds VETERANS ENTERPRISE TRAINING & SERVICES GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Lava Mae ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Global Good Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.