Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Glenna and Lawrence Shapiro Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$279kEnvironment$102kHousing & Shelter$102kHuman Services$77kArts & Culture$71kHealth$59kYouth Development$31kInternational$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCVTV$20,000
BRIDGE TO HOME$18,700
UTAH FOOD BANK$15,000
SSP JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MILLION LITTLE: $2k → 14%ROAD HOME: $10k → 8%ROAD HOME: $10k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $8k → 8%ROAD HOME: $8k → 8%ROAD HOME: $5k → 8%ROAD HOME: $5k → 8%ROAD HOME: $3k → 8%INN BETWEEN: $1k → 8%INN BETWEEN: $1k → 8%UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $1k → 8%THE INNBETWEEN: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$679k · 21 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
17

Total granted

$679k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+46%

Still filing today

67%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +93%
  • SC
    Sustainable Conservation
    5× · 2019–2023 · $90k · revenue +27%
  • TR
    THE ROAD HOME
    7× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • WC
    WORLD CENTRAL KITCHENORG
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • HU
    HEAL UT(THE HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH)
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • LA
    LIFT AND LOVE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +88%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

2
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
3
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Salt Lake Acting Company

Salt lake acting company's mission is to engage and enrich community through brave, contemporary theatre.

Arts & Culture
5
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
7
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
8
Sutter Valley Medical Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: Caring for our patients first and our people always. VISION: To be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Sunnyvale Community Services

The mission of sunnyvale community services is to prevent homelessness and hunger for low-income sunnyvale residents facing temporary crises.

Human Services
10
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
11
San Bernardino Valley Concert Association
12
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Refugee Connection and the most unlike its peers is Lift and Love Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Youth Development & Enrichm…Community Health CentersDog Rescue and Rehabilitati…Public Interest Advocacy Or…College and University Foun…Supportive Housing & Servic…Performing Arts Organizatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%4%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr10%17%35–55yr12%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr10%9%35–55yr12%57%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
16%
11,556/71,995

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UTAH FOOD BANK — $235,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKSANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY — $39,000 · OtherSANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRYJewish Family Service — $37,500 · OtherJewish Family ServiceCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH — $30,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAHBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SCV — $23,000 · OtherSCV HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $23,000 · Other+18 more — $79,300 · Other+18 moreSustainable Conservation — $90,000 · EnvironmentSustainable Co…LEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR — $3,500 · EnvironmentTHE ROAD HOME — $47,500 · Human ServicesTHE INN BETWEEN — $3,000 · Human ServicesMILLION LITTLE — $2,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE SHARING PLACE — $32,500 · HealthARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD — $10,005 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $1,500 · HealthBRIDGE TO HOME SCV — $43,700 · Community ImprovementSANTA CLARITA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Community ImprovementPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureARIZONA OPERA COMPANY — $10,000 · Arts & CultureUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSCVTV — $20,000 · Public Benefit
Other$466,800Environment$93,500Human Services$53,500Health$49,005Community Improvement$45,700Arts & Culture$22,000Public Benefit$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUTAH FOOD BANK — $235,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSustainable Conservation — $90,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME — $47,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE TO HOME SCV — $43,700 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY — $39,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetJewish Family Service — $37,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SHARING PLACE — $32,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetSCVTV — $20,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD — $10,005 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA OPERA COMPANY — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGranite Education Foundation — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT AND LOVE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR — $3,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Sustainable Conservation
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME
  • Who funds BRIDGE TO HOME SCV
  • Who funds SANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds Jewish Family Service
  • Who funds THE SHARING PLACE
  • Who funds SCVTV
  • Who funds ARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD
  • Who funds PHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds ARIZONA OPERA COMPANY
  • Who funds Granite Education Foundation
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH
  • Who funds LIFT AND LOVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SANTA CLARITA VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR
  • Who funds THE INN BETWEEN
  • Who funds MILLION LITTLE
  • Who funds SANTA CLARITA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lawrence & Janet Dee FoundationUT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Proverbs 39 Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · The Henry Mayo Newhall Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Glenna and Lawrence Shapiro Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph