· Private foundation
Glenn and Jean Harnett Private Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $501k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $234k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER | $184,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,007 |
| HEALTHY HEARTS AND PAWS | $42,000 |
| VOICES OF THE TRUMBULL COUNTY POUND | $42,000 |
| TNR OF WARREN INC | $40,000 |
| ALL ABOUT THE PAWS | $37,500 |
| TAILS OF HOPE INC | $36,000 |
| STRAYHAVEN ANIMAL SHELTER | $32,000 |
| NEVER MUZZLED INC | $32,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $31,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $29,000 |
| ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE OF WESTERN PA | $26,000 |
| HAPPY TRAILS FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY | $23,000 |
| GROVE CITY AREA PET RESCUE | $22,000 |
| SHENANGO VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER | $21,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against -38% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HEALTHY HEARTS AND PAWS PROJECT JASON COOKE4× · 2021–2024 · $295k · revenue +69%
- TOTAILS OF HOPE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $238k · revenue +77%
- TOTNR of Warren Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $224k · revenue +48% · 25% of their budget
Funded once
- BIBIRDS IN FLIGHT SANCTUARY INCone grant, 2021 · $20k
- TCTRUMBULL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICEone grant, 2022 · $17k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.
Animal Rescue
Animal Rescue
To help rescue unwanted pets
Animal rescue and housing
Rescuing rehabilitating and housing of abandoned and homeless dogs cats and small animals with the mission of finding them new forever homes
Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats
Animal Welfare
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empathy for Animals Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northeast Ohio Adoption Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 9 years old; the field is 24. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HEALTHY HEARTS AND PAWS PROJECT JASON COOKE ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL PAWTECTORS INC ↗
- Who funds TAILS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds TNR of Warren Inc ↗
- Who funds NEVER MUZZLED INC ↗
- Who funds SHENANGO VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
- Who funds FARMERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION XXX-XX-XXXX ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Strayhaven Animal Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds HAPPY TRAILS FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds GROVE CITY AREA PET RESCUE ↗
- Who funds ALL ABOUT THE PAWZ ↗
- Who funds Steel Valley Woofstock Inc ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE FARM CAT RESCUE ↗
- Who funds EMPATHY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds Otter Creek Farm Sanctuary Inc ↗
- Who funds GEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO ADOPTION SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Glenn and Jean Harnett Private Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Glenn and Jean Harnett Private Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Glenn and Jean Harnett Private Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.