Skip to content

· Private foundation

Glenda D Price Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$125kEducation$28kCivil Rights$23kReligion$22kScience & Tech$10kPhilanthropy$4kPublic Benefit$2kCommunity Improvement$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
WRIGHT MUSEUM$5,000
MARYGROVE CONSERVANCY$4,500
SISTERS SRVNTS OF IMM HEART MARY$3,500
HERITAGE WORKS$129
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%FOCUS HOPE: $15k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $5k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $3k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$182k · 8 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$182k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+20%

Still filing today

88%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • F
    FOCUSHOPE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue +51%
  • MC
    MARYGROVE CONSERVANCY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +132%
  • MS
    MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER
    5× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +100%
  • MC
    MARYGROVE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • DC
    DETROIT CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
3
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
4
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
5
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
8
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
9
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

—
10
Kalamazoo College

The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marygrove Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is The Tuxedo Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $112,500 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCMUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $129 · Arts & CultureSISTERS SERVANTS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY MONROE MICHIGAN INC: $18,500 · OtherSISTERS SERVANTS OF THE I…WRIGHT MUSEUM: $5,000 · OtherWRIGHT MUSEUMMARYGROVE COLLEGE: $5,000 · OtherMARYGROVE COLLEGEDETROIT CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $3,500 · OtherDETROIT CRISTO REY HIGH S…SISTERS SRVNTS OF IMM HEART MARY: $3,500 · OtherSISTERS SRVNTS OF IMM HEA…Individual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SE MICH: $2,500 · OtherMOSAIC YOUTH THEATER: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,800 · Other+3 more: $2,850 · Other+3 moreMARYGROVE CONSERVANCY: $9,500 · EducationMARYGROVE CONS…MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $9,500 · EducationMICHIGAN SCIEN…Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $5,500 · EducationTemple Univers…ALMA COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationALMA COLLEGEMERCY EDUCATION PROJECT: $1,000 · EducationFOCUSHOPE: $22,500 · Human ServicesFOCUSHOPETHE CENTER FOR MICHIGAN: $2,000 · Public BenefitTHE TUXEDO PROJECT: $500 · Community ImprovementCOTS: $200 · Housing & Shelter
Arts & Culture$117,629Other$50,150Education$27,500Human Services$22,500Public Benefit$2,000Community Improvement$500Housing & Shelter$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $112,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUSHOPE: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARYGROVE CONSERVANCY: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $9,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARYGROVE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR MICHIGAN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY EDUCATION PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOTS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE WORKS: $129 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSHOPE ↗
  • Who funds MARYGROVE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds MARYGROVE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALMA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE TUXEDO PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds COTS ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE WORKS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation · Michigan Humanities Council · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glenda D Price Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glenda D Price Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glenda D Price’s filings →

    More from the funding graph