Skip to content
Glazerc Ta at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Glazerc Ta

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$281kCommunity Improvement$335
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$52k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY$11,087
SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY$9,717
MESSIAH COLLEGE$5,043
VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY$3,000
PASSHE COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY$3,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$2,543
WILSON COLLEGE$2,543
FORT HOOD COLLEGE$2,000
SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY$2,000
YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA$2,000
SAMFORD UNIVERSITY$2,000
ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE$2,000
LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE$543
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY$543
KING'S COLLEGE$543
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%WILSON COLLEGE: $5k → 9%LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $4k → 9%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%JUNIATA COLLEGE: $5k → 13%BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY: $3k → 14%SAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%UNIV OF BUFFALO: $4k → 13%YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2k → 5%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIV: $6k → 12%ROLLINS COLLEGE: $6k → 13%SAMFORD UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%UNIV OF ALABAMA: $2k → 17%TENNESSEE TECH UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%UNCW: $4k → 12%HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY: $3k → 21%FORT HOOD COLLEGE: $2k → 6%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $24k → 8%WILSON COLLEGE: $3k → 9%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%JUNIATA COLLEGE: $3k → 13%PASSHE COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $3k → 14%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 16%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%UNC WILMINGTON: $3k → 12%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%MESSIAH COLLEGE: $3k → 8%FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $4k → 9%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%MOUNT ALOYSLUS COLLEGE: $3k → 16%MESSIAH COLLEGE: $3k → 8%MESSIAH COLLEGE: $5k → 8%ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $2k → 9%ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
OR
PA
NJ
UT
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$250k · 26 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
13

Total granted

$250k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+18%

Still filing today

69%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MESSIAH UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +9%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +15%
  • JC
    JUNIATA COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • Washington and Lee Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +58%
  • UC
    UNCW CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -13%
  • UW
    UNC WILMINGTON
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
7
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
8
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
11
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
12
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is King's College; the most unlike its peers is Elizabethtown College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
24/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $71,799 · OtherSHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITYPENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $32,045 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $13,174 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY+16 more: $40,030 · Other+16 moreMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $11,946 · EducationMESSIAH UNIVERSITYBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $9,403 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYJUNIATA COLLEGE: $8,823 · EducationJUNIATA COLLEGEWILSON COLLEGE: $8,223 · EducationWILSON COLLEGEKING'S COLLEGE: $7,372 · EducationKING'S COLLEGEEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $7,043 · EducationEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INCROLLINS COLLEGE: $7,043 · EducationROLLINS COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $6,578 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $5,991 · EducationLANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $5,972 · EducationSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $5,972 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5,680 · EducationWashington and Lee University: $5,000 · EducationSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $4,934 · Education+10 more: $19,758 · Education+10 more
Other$157,048Education$124,738

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $11,946 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $9,403 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIATA COLLEGE: $8,823 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILSON COLLEGE: $8,223 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKING'S COLLEGE: $7,372 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $7,043 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROLLINS COLLEGE: $7,043 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $6,578 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $5,991 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $5,972 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $5,972 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5,680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $4,934 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNCW CORPORATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE: $3,803 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $3,025 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $2,329 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSamford University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYCOMING COLLEGE: $1,149 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILKES UNIVERSITY: $817 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $482 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $482 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JUNIATA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KING'S COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROLLINS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNCW CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationRenaissance Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Verizon FoundationNJ12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glazerc Ta funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glazerc Ta. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 11% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Rollins College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glazerc Ta’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home