Skip to content

· Public charity

Glasgow High School Educational Trust

The purpose of the trust is to grant financial aid to glasgow high school graduates in their pursuit of higher education

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MArts & Culture$18k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $104,082, the rows itemized in this filing. The $126,082 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $22,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$11,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MSU - BOZEMAN$29,000
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA$23,000
GLASGOW HIGH SCHOOL$16,582
MONTANA TECH$11,500
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$6,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$6,000
SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES$6,000
MSU - BILLINGS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHADRON STATE COLLEGE: $7k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $8k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO: $7k → 22%CARROLL COLLEGE: $12k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $23k → 9%MSU - BILLINGS: $26k → 9%MILES COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8k → 11%GLASGOW HIGH SCHOOL: $46k → 12%PIMA MEDICAL INSTITUTE: $9k → 12%MONTANA TECH: $7k → 16%MSU NORTHERN: $16k → 18%MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $8k → 15%APPALACHIAN BIBLE COLLEGE: $7k → 20%WILLISTON STATE COLLEGE: $8k → 8%DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 9%MINOT STATE UNIVERSITY: $22k → 10%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $18k → 13%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%PRESENTATION COLLEGE: $9k → 11%SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $7k → 20%CARROLL COLLEGE: $9k → 9%MONTANA TECH: $12k → 9%MSU - BILLINGS: $17k → 9%GLASGOW HIGH SCHOOL: $18k → 12%U OF M WESTERN: $8k → 12%MSU NORTHERN: $16k → 18%WILLISTON STATE COLLEGE: $8k → 8%DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 9%MINOT STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $17k → 13%PRESENTATION COLLEGE: $8k → 11%SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES: $9k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $10k → 9%MSU - BILLINGS: $12k → 9%GLASGOW HIGH SCHOOL: $17k → 12%MSU - NORTHERN: $11k → 18%WILLISTON STATE COLLEGE: $8k → 8%MINOT STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $14k → 13%MONTANA TECH: $10k → 9%MSU - BILLINGS: $9k → 9%GLASGOW HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 12%MINOT STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $9k → 9%GLASGOW HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 12%ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $9k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
ND
SD
OH
UT
CO
NE
WV
AZ
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 20 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$1.0M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+17%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +58%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $21k · revenue +31%
  • CC
    CARROLL COLLEGE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $21k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • PM
    PIMA MEDICAL INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • MV
    MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGEgraduated
    2× · 2018–2019 · $8k · revenue +40%
  • UO
    University of Idaho
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
3
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
4
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
5
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
6
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
9
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
10
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
11
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities

Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities accredits institutions of higher education by applying evidence-informed standards and processes to support continuous improvements and promote equitable student achievement and success.

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montana Technological University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is University of Mary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MSU - BOZEMAN: $319,500 · OtherMSU - BOZEMANGLASGOW HIGH SCHOOL: $109,955 · OtherGLASGOW HIGH SCHOOLMSU BILLINGS: $76,000 · OtherMSU BILLINGSTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $76,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANAMINOT STATE UNIVERSITY: $56,000 · OtherMINOT STATE UNIVERSITYUniversity of North Dakota-College of Business & Public Admin: $55,000 · OtherUniversity of North Dakota-College of Business & Public AdminMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHERN: $49,500 · Other+20 more: $217,000 · Other+20 moreMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $46,500 · EducationMONTANA TECHNOLO…SDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT: $30,500 · EducationSDSM&T CENTER FO…ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $21,000 · EducationROCKY MOUNTAIN C…CARROLL COLLEGE: $21,000 · EducationCARROLL COLLEGEPresentation College: $17,000 · EducationPresentation Col…MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationUniversity of Mary: $6,000 · EducationWESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationWGU CORPORATION: $5,500 · Education
Other$958,955Education$161,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $46,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT: $30,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL COLLEGE: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresentation College: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN BIBLE COLLEGE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Mary: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWGU CORPORATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Presentation College ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN BIBLE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Mary ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WGU CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Tulsa Community Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · John W McKee Educational Trust · Durnill Charitable Trust · National Writing Project Corporation · Treacy Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glasgow High School Educational Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glasgow High School Educational Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Glasgow High School Educational Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Glasgow High School Educational Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glasgow High School Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph