Skip to content

· Private foundation

Giving Well Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$150kEducation$110kHuman Services$70kFood & Nutrition$51kHealth$43kEnvironment$27kRecreation & Sports$23kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k6 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION$15,000
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$5,043
CARROLL COUNTY HEALTH DEPT$5,000
THE HAVEN OF PORTAGE COUNTY$2,500
WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY$2,500
WEST CREEK CONSERVANCY$2,000
CARROLL COUNTY HEALTH DEPT$225
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%DUNEDIN CARES FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 12%Crestwood 4C's: $100 → 12%THE HAVEN OF PORTAGE COUNTY: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Giving Well Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 76%.

Giving Well Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$344k · 28 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 24 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
50

Total granted

$344k
$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+183%

Still filing today

25%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Mount Union
    3× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +36%
  • WR
    WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $10k · revenue +73%
  • CC
    CARROLL COUNTY ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • KF
    KSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • CC
    CARROLL COUNTY JR FAIR FIC
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • SO
    Stewards of Kleinstuck
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
2
Concerned Citizens of Portage Lake

Portage Lake environment preservation

Environment
3
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
4
Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources

The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…

Environment
5
Winous Point Marsh Conservancy

To assure the protection and stewardship of one of ohio's largest wetlands; to facilitate wetland conservation and restoration efforts in the more than 15,000 acres contiguous to and including the conservancy property; to increase research…

Environment
6
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
7
Tinkers Creek Watershed Partners

To protect and restore water quality and habitats of the tinkers creek watershed through community partnerships. the tinker's creek watershed drains 96.4 square miles and is the largest tributary to the cuyahoga river. the watershed area…

—
8
Chagrin River Watershed Partners Inc

Preserving and enhancing the scenic and environmental quality of the ecosystem of the chagrin river, lake erie and other ohio watersheds in a manner which assures a sustainable future for people, plants and animals.

Human Services
9
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
10
Heartlands Conservancy

The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.

Environment
11
Little Traverse Conservancy Inc

Little Traverse Conservancy protects land in northern Michigan by owning it as Nature Preserves and Working Forest Reserves, and through Conservation Easements (perpetual, voluntary agreements that guard the conservation values of the…

Environment
12
The Clearwater Conservancy of Central Pennsylvania Inc

To conserve and restore the natural resources through land conservation, water resources stewardship and environmental outreach across central pennsylvania.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hiram College; the most unlike its peers is Crestwood 4CS. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY: $93,865 · OtherUNITED WAYTHE HAVEN: $46,000 · OtherTHE HAVENKENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $27,582 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYCLEVELAND METRO PARKS: $16,000 · OtherKSU FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,164 · Other+58 more: $181,961 · Other+58 moreUniversity of Mount Union: $45,000 · EducationUniversity o…KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $8,999 · EducationKALAMAZOO CO…HIRAM COLLEGE: $5,250 · EducationHIRAM COLLEG…+1 more: $1,473 · EducationPINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyPINELLAS …UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $20,809 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…Stewards of Kleinstuck: $10,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $9,500 · EnvironmentMANTUA RESTORATION SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentKalamazoo Nature Center: $4,909 · EnvironmentWEST CREEK CONSERVANCY: $3,000 · EnvironmentOHIO PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $9,000 · HealthCARROLL COUNTY ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE: $7,270 · AnimalsShepherds House of Portage County: $2,500 · Human ServicesDunedin Cares Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesSUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesOPEN ROADS BIKE PROGRAM: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$393,572Education$60,722Philanthropy$45,809Environment$32,409Health$9,000Animals$7,270Human Services$5,100Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $20,809 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PORTAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetStewards of Kleinstuck: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $9,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $8,999 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL COUNTY ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE: $7,270 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHIRAM COLLEGE: $5,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMANTUA RESTORATION SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetKalamazoo Nature Center: $4,909 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST CREEK CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShepherds House of Portage County: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDunedin Cares Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAIR FOOD MATTERS: $1,200 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetOPEN ROADS BIKE PROGRAM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
  • Who funds PINELLAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PORTAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Stewards of Kleinstuck ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OHIO PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL COUNTY ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds HIRAM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MANTUA RESTORATION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Kalamazoo Nature Center ↗
  • Who funds WEST CREEK CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Giving Well Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Giving Well Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Giving Well Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph