Skip to content

· Community foundation

Giving Hope Network a Nj Non Profit Corporation

The organizations mission is to develop shared solutions for large, complex societal challenges.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$418kHealth$130kHuman Services$15kYouth Development$11kEducation$6k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $35,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $42,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELEOS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%THE PEACE CENTER: $5k → 6%CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $32k → 5%MILHILL CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMEN: $5k → 11%CROSSROADS4HOPE: $26k → 5%MILLHILL CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 11%CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $24k → 5%CROSSROADS4HOPE: $22k → 5%CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$537k · 3 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$537k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-7%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    ELEOS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $418k · revenue -20% · 35% of their budget
  • C
    CROSSROADS4HOPE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $109k · revenue +309%
  • MILLHILL CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • S
    SPECTRUM360graduated
    3× · 2018–2022 · $14k · revenue +80%
  • PF
    Profectum Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue -15%
  • TH
    THE HAGEDORN LITTLE VILLAGE SCHOOLgraduated
    3× · 2017–2021 · $6k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caps International Inc

Academic and Therapeutic services to ASD children

Health
2
The Center for Education Nj Inc

The school's mission is to provide a quality, comprehensive education and therapy services to students with disabilities.

Education
3
Child Development Center Inc

The Child Development Center is a developmental day center designed to build the independence of exceptional children through high-quality early education and therapeutic services. It serves special needs children ages 2 to 5 from New…

Education
4
The Vincent Smith School

The Vincent Smith School is a co-ed, independent, special education school for grades ones through twelve, serving Nassau, Suffolk, and New York City students. The School specializes in students with various learning issues.

Education
5
Educational Partnership for Instructing Children Inc

The educational partnership for instructing children (epic) is dedicated to providing educational services for individuals with autism and pervasive developmental disorder (pdd).

Education
6
Linden Oaks

We envision thriving communities where every individual has the opportunity to reach their full potential through transformative therapy and education.

Health
7
Giant Steps Illinois Inc

Giant Steps Illinois, Inc. is committed to providing individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders, and their families, superior educational and therapeutic services focused on improving the quality of daily life from early chilldhood through…

Education
8
Crossroads Center for Children

Crossroads Center for Children is an integrated school for children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum And Related Disorders.

Education
9
The Ivymount School Inc

Nonprofit organization that provides educational programs and therapeutic services that invest in the abilities of neurodivergent children and young adults with unique learning needs including special education.

Education
10
Families Helping Families of Acadiana Inc

Counseling - the organization serves as a resourse center for individuals with disabilities and families who have children with special needs. services include referral, training, and evaluation.

Human Services
11
Milestones Behavioral Services Inc

Non-profit school for autistic children, early intervention aba services, and consulting.

Education
12
Cincinnati Center for Autism

We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hagedorn Little Village School; the most unlike its peers is Eleos International Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELEOS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $418,350 · InternationalELEOS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INCCROSSROADS4HOPE: $109,045 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS4HOPEMILLHILL CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,100 · Human ServicesMILLHILL CHILD & FAMILY …THE PEACE CENTER INC: $5,100 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM360: $14,000 · EducationTHE HAGEDORN LITTLE VILLAGE SCHOOL: $6,019 · EducationKORO KIDS CONNECTIONS: $6,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF DELAWARE INC: $5,009 · OtherProfectum Foundation: $7,000 · Health
International$418,350Human Services$124,245Education$20,019Other$11,009Health$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetELEOS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $418,350 over 9y, 35% of budgetCROSSROADS4HOPE: $109,045 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetSPECTRUM360: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMILLHILL CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetProfectum Foundation: $7,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE HAGEDORN LITTLE VILLAGE SCHOOL: $6,019 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEACE CENTER INC: $5,100 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF DELAWARE INC: $5,009 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Giving Hope Network a Nj Non Profit Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Giving Hope Network a Nj Non Profit Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 73%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of Delaware Inc: 73% of income from government
  • CROSSROADS4HOPE: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Giving Hope Network a Nj Non Profit Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Giving Hope Network a Nj Non Profit Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Giving Hope Network a Nj Non Profit’s filings →

More from the funding graph