Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gius Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$455k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Housing & Shelter$750kFood & Nutrition$685kReligion$353kAnimals$270kRecreation & Sports$224kPhilanthropy$205kEducation$74kHealth$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $365k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$120,000
ST TIMOTHY LUTHERAN CHURCH$85,000
ST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$80,000
COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION$80,000
WEST COAST AQUATICS$30,000
GRANT COUNTY ANIMAL OUTREACH$20,000
WENATCHEE VALLEY SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER$10,000
CENTRAL COLUMBIA SENIOR LIVING DBA THE CAMBRIDGE$10,000
ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
PAWS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $800k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $150k → 9%COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION: $80k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $120k → 9%COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $80k → 9%COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $60k → 9%COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $35k → 9%COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $32k → 9%COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $32k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $31k → 9%ALATHEIA RIDING CENTER: $25k → 9%ALATHEIA RIDING CENTER: $20k → 9%WENATCHEE VALLEY SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Gius Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 80% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Gius Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 14 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$2.6M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
0%

Still filing today

43%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CENTRAL COLUMBIA SENIOR LIVING
    8× · 2017–2024 · $670k · revenue +123%
  • CB
    COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $205k · revenue +260%
  • WC
    West Coast Aquatics
    7× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOVING AND LEARNING PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • QV
    QUINCY VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • QB
    QUINCY BOOSTER CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $24k · revenue +226% · 34% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Quincy Rotary Club

International and community service

2
Sequim Prairie Grange

Promoting family, farm & community life

3
Quincy Valley Chamber of Commerce

To promote local business in the quincy valley

4
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
5
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
6
Mid-Columbia Senior Center Inc

The mid-columbia senior center provides social and other beneficial services to seniors.

Unclassified
7
Quinter Community Development Inc

Community development

Community Improvement
8
Gig Harbor Chamber of Commerce

Serve the small business community and local development.

9
Welfare for Animals Guild

Provide for the interim health and well being of homeless dogs through veterinary medical care and adoption, or temporary placement in foster homes.

Animals
10
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
11
Chewelah Valley Land Trust Non Profit Land Trust Cvlt

Preservation of community forests, supporting education and community utilization of community lands in the Chewelah Valley.

Environment
12
Columbia Falls Food Bank

Provide food to local needy

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quincy Booster Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grant County Animal Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST TIMOTHY LUTHERAN CHURCH — $210,830 · OtherST TIMOTHY LUTHERAN CHURCHST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH — $207,000 · OtherST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCHPAWS — $130,000 · OtherPAWSQUINCY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $60,000 · OtherQUINCY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETYGRANT CO ANIMAL OUTREACH — $50,000 · OtherGRANT CO ANIMAL OUTREACHAGFARMATION — $40,000 · OtherQUINCY VALLEY SCHOOL — $38,629 · OtherLOVING AND LEARNING PRESCHOOL — $30,000 · Other+4 more — $46,000 · Other+4 moreSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES — $539,500 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE …COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION — $205,000 · Human ServicesCOLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATIONALATHEIA RIDING CENTER — $45,000 · Human ServicesALATHEIA RIDING CENTER+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL COLUMBIA SENIOR LIVING — $670,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL COLUMBIA SENIOR LIVI…West Coast Aquatics — $200,000 · Recreation & SportsQUINCY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $105,000 · Food & NutritionGRANT COUNTY ANIMAL OUTREACH — $90,000 · AnimalsQUINCY BOOSTER CLUB INC — $23,617 · Education
Other$812,459Human Services$799,500Housing & Shelter$670,000Recreation & Sports$200,000Food & Nutrition$105,000Animals$90,000Education$23,617

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRAL COLUMBIA SENIOR LIVING — $670,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES — $539,500 over 8y, 39% of budgetCOLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION — $205,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetWest Coast Aquatics — $200,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetQUINCY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $105,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetGRANT COUNTY ANIMAL OUTREACH — $90,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetALATHEIA RIDING CENTER — $45,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetQUINCY VALLEY SCHOOL — $38,629 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetQUINCY BOOSTER CLUB INC — $23,617 over 1y, 34% of budgetWenatchee Valley Senior Activity Center — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND — $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL COLUMBIA SENIOR LIVING
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES
  • Who funds COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds West Coast Aquatics
  • Who funds QUINCY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds GRANT COUNTY ANIMAL OUTREACH
  • Who funds ALATHEIA RIDING CENTER
  • Who funds QUINCY VALLEY SCHOOL
  • Who funds QUINCY VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds QUINCY BOOSTER CLUB INC
  • Who funds Wenatchee Valley Senior Activity Center
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF MERCER ISLAND

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of NcwWA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Ncw · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gius Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph