Skip to content

Washington · Private foundation

Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$438k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2024
22
Organizations funded FY2023
59%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$15,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$139,200
Organizations funded a year
2 to 22
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
8
Total assets, FY2024
$16M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 59% of the organizations Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 55% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $268k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving14$363k36%
FY202322$489k59%
FY202220$590k100%
FY20192$17n/a
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$1.2MHealth$335kPhilanthropy$150kEnvironment$57kHuman Services$52kArts & Culture$21kReligion$21kHousing & Shelter$16kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
IA
CT
CA
CO
AZ
DC
AL
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
New York University$272,20020%
Global Lyme Alliance Inc$268,00039%
The Seattle Aquarium Society$55,00030%
Childhaven$50,00010%
Corporation of Gonzaga University$50,00010%
University of Washington$31,1803n/a
Epiphany School$23,50020%
Lakeside School$20,00020%
Impactful Fund$20,000126%
One Roof$15,00011%
Show all 25 grantees
All grantees of Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
New York University$272,20020%
Global Lyme Alliance Inc$268,00039%
The Seattle Aquarium Society$55,00030%
Childhaven$50,00010%
Corporation of Gonzaga University$50,00010%
University of Washington$31,1803n/a
Epiphany School$23,50020%
Lakeside School$20,00020%
Impactful Fund$20,000126%
One Roof$15,00011%
St Jude Hospital$10,00010%
A Little Rescue$10,00012%
Northwest Film Forum$5,00010%
Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America$5,0001n/a
American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches$5,00010%
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc$5,00010%
Seattle Arts and Lectures$5,00010%
Pacific Science Center Foundation$5,00010%
Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame$4,00020%
Beta Phi Educational Foundation$2,50013%
World Central Kitchen Inc$2,50010%
Providence Hospice of Seattle Foundation$2,00010%
Camp Korey$1,00510%
The Wilderness Society$1,00010%
Seattle Garden Club Inc$1,00011%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 15 recipients with no EIN on record ($573k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 23 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew York University: $272,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Lyme Alliance Inc: $268,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetThe Seattle Aquarium Society: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChildhaven: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCorporation of Gonzaga University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEpiphany School: $23,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLakeside School: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetImpactful Fund: $20,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetOne Roof: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSt Jude Hospital: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Little Rescue: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNorthwest Film Forum: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Symphony Orchestra Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Arts and Lectures: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPacific Science Center Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNaismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeta Phi Educational Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetWorld Central Kitchen Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProvidence Hospice of Seattle Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Korey: $1,005 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Wilderness Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Garden Club Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 23.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Grousemont Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation with peer funders

About Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation

How much does Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation give?
Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation reported 16 grants totaling $438,400 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 22 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (23%), Health (6%), Philanthropy (3%).
Who are Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: New York University ($272k), Global Lyme Alliance Inc ($268k), The Seattle Aquarium Society ($55k).
Does Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 59% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Seattle Foundation, Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, Grousemont Foundation.
Where is Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation based?
Ginger and Barry Ackerley Foundation is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ginger and Barry Ackerley’s filings →

More from the funding graph