Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gibrall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$507k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.2MEducation$314kReligion$148kRecreation & Sports$39kHuman Services$38kInternational$7kHousing & Shelter$5kHealth$500
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TR Price Charitable Fund - Gibrall Fund$500,000
VCU Ram Athletic Fund$5,000
St Anthony's Maronite Church$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Pajama Program Inc: $2k → 17%Operation Healing Forces: $21k → 13%Operation Healing Forces: $10k → 13%Good Samaritan Ministries: $100 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$331k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
15

Total granted

$1.4M
$330k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+29%

Still filing today

25%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TR Price Charitable Fund - Gibrall Fund
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M
  • OL
    Our Lady of Lebanon
    3× · 2020–2022 · $90k
  • SA
    Saint Anthony's Maronite Catholic Church
    3× · 2020–2022 · $52k

Funded once

  • SA
    Saint Anthony's Maronite Catholic Church Scholarship Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $301k
  • C
    CARITASgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR IN RICHMOND
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Baptist Health Richmond Inc

To provide quality health care by a team of highly-skilled physicians & staff through nurturing, personalized services.

—
3
Samaritan's Purse

Samaritan's purse is a nondenominational evangelical christian organization providing spiritual and physical aid to hurting people around the world. since 1970, samaritan's purse has helped meet the needs of people who are victims of war,…

Religion
4
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio

The organization's mission is to improve the health status of the community it serves.

Health
5
Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc

The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.

Human Services
6
Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

Health
7
Catholic Residential Services Inc Dba Benedictine Living Communities of Wi

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

Human Services
8
Holy Name Medical Center Inc

Holy name medical center, inc. is a community of caregivers committed to a ministry of healing, embracing the tradition of catholic principles, the pursuit of professional excellence and conscientious stewardship. we help our community…

Health
9
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas

The mission of Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas is to perform sacred work by uniting kindness, quality, and healing through the provision of health care services to the community.

Health
10
Bethesda Health Comprehensive Imaging Services Inc

As a part of the Baptist Health network, THE MISSION OF BETHESDA HEALTH COMPREHENSIVE IMAGING SERVICES, INC. WAS to improve the health and well-being of individuals and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life in the communities we…

Health
11
Benedictine Living Communities - Bismarck Inc Dba St Gabriels Community

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
12
Catholic Health Services Inc

To provide health care and services to those in need; to minimize human suffering; to assist people to wholeness and to nurture an awareness of their relationship with god.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Sisters of the Poor in Richmond; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TR Price Charitable Fund - Gibrall Fund: $1,200,000 · OtherTR Price Charitable Fund - Gibrall FundSaint Anthony's Maronite Catholic Church Scholarship Fund: $300,800 · OtherSaint Anthony's Maronite Catholic Church Scholarship FundOur Lady of Lebanon: $89,736 · Other+13 more: $110,016 · Other+13 moreOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesBEYOND BEDTIME INC: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesHAYKEL HUMANITARIAN FUND FOR LEBANON INC: $7,000 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR IN RICHMOND: $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthCARITAS: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterBENEDICTINE SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education
Other$1,700,552Human Services$33,100Health$12,500Housing & Shelter$5,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $31,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCARITAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR IN RICHMOND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND BEDTIME INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENEDICTINE SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC ↗
  • Who funds HAYKEL HUMANITARIAN FUND FOR LEBANON INC ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR IN RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BEDTIME INC ↗
  • Who funds BENEDICTINE SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gibrall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gibrall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gibrall’s filings →

    More from the funding graph