Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gianaras Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$540kHealth$378kReligion$288kEducation$164kHuman Services$66kCrime & Legal$36kPhilanthropy$30kRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $66k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION$16,700
NATIONAL HELLENIC MUSEUM$15,200
ARCHBISHOP IAKOVOS LEADERSHIP 100 FUND$14,000
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
ALPHA 4TH OF JULY$10,000
ORDER OF ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE$9,400
ASCENSION OF OUR LORD GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$6,500
ST ANDREWS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$6,000
ST NORBERT CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
HELLENIC BAR ASSOCIATION$5,000
CRYSTAL FALLS CONTEMPORARY CENTER$5,000
WILLISTON STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$5,000
CHICAGO WOLVES CHARITIES$5,000
GREEK AMERICAN REHABILITATION & CARE CENTER$5,000
ST NECTARIOS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $238k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $8k → 5%KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $5k → 5%KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 5%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $103k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $57k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $17k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CHICAGO WOLVES CHARITIES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CO
MO
VA
TN
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 37 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
28

Total granted

$1.3M
$183k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+31%

Still filing today

30%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $217k · revenue +55%
  • BC
    BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP
    3× · 2017–2023 · $113k · revenue +65%
  • HC
    HIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • HC
    HELLENIC COLLEGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • WC
    WESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • WF
    WESTERN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pano Koumantaros Cancer Research Fund Inc
Philanthropy
2
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
3
University of Chicago Cancer Research Foundation

The mission shall be to provide fundraising, advocacy, and advisory support for cancer research at the comprehensive cancer center at the university of chicago.

Health
4
The Chicago Home for Incurables

The primary purpose of the chicago home for incurables, ("the home"), is to provide financial support to the university of chicago for the operation of patient care facilities and funding of research of incurable diseases at the university…

Health
5
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
6
Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation

The hairy cell leukemia foundation is dedicated to improving outcomes for patients by advancing research into the causes and treatment of hairy cell leukemia, as well as by providing educational resources and comfort to all those affected…

—
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
9
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
10
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
11
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Northwoods Airlifeline Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $112,500 · OtherBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMPST ANDREWS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $104,680 · OtherST ANDREWS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCHHELLENIC COLLEGE INC: $100,000 · OtherHELLENIC COLLEGE INCGREEK ORTHODOX METROPOLIS OF CHI: $36,450 · OtherORDER OF ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE INC: $28,900 · OtherILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $27,500 · OtherST NORBERT CATHOLIC CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherASCENSION OF OUR LORD GREEK: $23,300 · Other+47 more: $234,075 · Other+47 moreNational Hellenic Museum: $503,200 · Arts & CultureNational Hellenic MuseumLITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $216,800 · Human ServicesLITTLE CITY FOUND…KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION INC: $15,700 · Human ServicesKEEP SWIMMING FOU…+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesHIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $30,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · HealthPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthHELLENIC BAR ASSOCIATION: $36,400 · Crime & LegalWILLISTON STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $1,500 · EducationPanhellenic Scholarship Foundation: $1,000 · EducationORPHANS OF THE STORM: $4,500 · AnimalsChicago Zoological Society: $1,000 · AnimalsMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$692,405Arts & Culture$503,200Human Services$237,500Health$46,000Crime & Legal$36,400Education$7,500Animals$5,500Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Hellenic Museum: $503,200 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetLITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $216,800 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $112,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetHELLENIC BAR ASSOCIATION: $36,400 over 8y, 60% of budgetHIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $30,500 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREEK AMERICAN REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTRE: $5,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO WOLVES CHARITIES: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWILLISTON STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOODS AIRLIFELINE LTD: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPanhellenic Scholarship Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds National Hellenic Museum ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds HELLENIC BAR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KEEP SWIMMING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEK AMERICAN REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO WOLVES CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds WILLISTON STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Buhler Kapsalis Family FoundationWI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Buhler Kapsalis Family Foundation · The John C Kulis Charitable Foundation · Hellenic Foundation · Greek American Restaurant Association · Vranas Family Foundation Co John P Vranas · The Renaissance Fund NFP · The John P Calamos Foundation · Metropoulos Family Foundation · Joannides Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Greater Horizons

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gianaras Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gianaras Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gianaras’ filings →

    More from the funding graph