· Private foundation
Gerrish H Milliken Foundation 009209-009
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k105 grants · $344k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $239k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL | $30,000 |
| MAINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $28,000 |
| ISLAND HOUSING TRUST | $25,000 |
| ASHLEY BRYAN CENTER | $20,000 |
| MOUNT DESSERT NURSING ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| CORINTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIO | $15,000 |
| HEALTHY ACADIA | $13,000 |
| COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC | $13,000 |
| NOVA UKRAINE | $10,000 |
| JUSTICEAID | $10,000 |
| NORTHEAST HARBOR LIBRARY | $10,000 |
| RAZOM | $10,000 |
| ACADIA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MOUNT DESERT NURSERY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.
148 repeat relationships — 108 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MDMOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL4× · 2022–2025 · $88k · revenue +7%
- IHISLAND HOUSING TRUST4× · 2022–2025 · $66k · revenue +249%
IMPACT JUSTICE2× · 2023–2024 · $56k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- NLNORTHERN LIGHT EASTERN MAINE MEDICAL CENone grant, 2023 · $33k
- WEWOMEN ENGAGED INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +33%
- UWUNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY FBO COVID-19 COMMUNITY RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.
To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.
Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…
Metro housing boston mobilizes wide-ranging resources to provide innovative and personalized services that lead families and individuals to housing stability, economic security, and an improved quality of life.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To create decent, affordable housing for those in need, and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.
Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.
Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…
Partnering with economically disadvantaged individuals and families. Hancock County Habitat For Humanity seeks to eliminate poverty housing and to make decent, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.
Maine Farmland Trust protects farmland, supports farmers, and advances the future of farming.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Missoula Urban Demonstration Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
133 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 133 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST ↗
- Who funds IMPACT JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT NURSING ASSOC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC ↗
- Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ACADIA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Maine Audubon Society ↗
- Who funds JusticeAid ↗
- Who funds THE ASHLEY BRYAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY ACADIA ↗
- Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST HARBOR LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds HOME INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE TYGER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
- Who funds PENDLETON PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Essie Justice Group ↗
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH'S PROMISE ↗
- Who funds BRAC USA INC ↗
- Who funds Spartanburg County Foundation ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW LEARNING JOURNEY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT STEP DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOST INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds United Help Ukraine Inc ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM CENTER ↗
- Who funds MAINE WOMENS FUND ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust Co · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Colket Family Foundation · Spartanburg County Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Florence V Burden Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · The Jolley Foundation · United Community Bank Foundation · Hattie a and Fred C Lynam Trust · Bristle Cone Pine Foundation 009266-000 · Mary Black Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gerrish H Milliken Foundation 009209-009 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gerrish H Milliken Foundation 009209-009?
Find your warmest path to Gerrish H Milliken Foundation 009209-009 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.