Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gering Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$247kHealth$21kEnvironment$12kReligion$5kFood & Nutrition$4kArts & Culture$4kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GROW COMMUNITY GARDEN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDENS: $650 → 10%HOBBY WHEEL: $5k → 17%LAMBO SPUR BIKE TRAIL: $5k → 10%EVEREST GRIDIRON: $1k → 11%HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR THE ENDOWMENT: $1k → 13%CONSERVANCY OF SW FLORIDA: $1k → 10%WINMAN TRAILS: $231k → 10%GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 11%NORTH LAKELAND BUCKS: $5k → 10%GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 11%MW HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 10%WAUSAU NORDIC SKI CLUB: $5k → 11%GROW COMMUNITY GARDEN: $1k → 10%WINMAN TRAILS INC: $5k → 11%MLWA: $500 → 10%FESTIVAL OF TREES: $5k → 11%GROW COMMUNITY GARDEN: $500 → 10%FESTIVAL OF TREES: $5k → 11%MANITOWISH WATERS FIREFIGHTERS: $500 → 10%ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%MANITOWISH SKIING: $250 → 10%GOOD SHEPHERD: $5k → 11%NEIGHBORS PLACE: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$250k · 4 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
17

Total granted

$250k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+30%

Still filing today

25%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WINMAN TRAILS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $236k
  • FO
    FESTIVAL OF TREES
    2× · 2020–2022 · $10k
  • GP
    GIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k

Funded once

  • HY
    HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +23%
  • WN
    WAUSAU NORDIC SKI CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • AH
    ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Natural Resources Foundation of

To protect wisconsin's lands, waters, and wildlife by providing funding, leading partnerships, and connecting all people with nature.

—
2
Wolverine Nordic Ski Club Inc

To provide recreational ski trail to area residents and to visitors to gogebic county, michigan. to provide cross country ski lessons and to hold other fitness conscious events during the year.

Recreation & Sports
3
West Wisconsin Land Trust Inc

The mission of the west wisconsin land trust, inc. is to preserve western wisconsin's natural character by informing, facilitating, and partnering with private landowners, communities, and local governments to protect valuable land.

—
4
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
5
Northeast Wisconsin Land Trust Inc

To preserve lands that protect our waters, landscapes and natural habitats in northeast wisconsin. ne wisconsin is critical to the health of the largest freshwater estuaries in the world-lake michigan's crucial wetlands.

Environment
6
Aspirus Ironwood Hospital & Clinics Inc

We heal people, promote health, and strengthen communities.

Health
7
Southern Wisconsin Land Conservancy

Dedicated to working with land owners to protect conservation-worthy land and natural resources of southern wisconsin.

Environment
8
The Ironman Foundation Inc

To leave ironman's legacy through philanthropy, volunteerism and grant making; by supporting various athletic, community, education, health, human services and public benefit non-profit organizations around the world.

Philanthropy
9
Aspirus Wausau Hospital Inc

We heal people, promote health, and strengthen communities.

Health
10
Wisconsin Wildlife Federation Inc

The wisconsin wildlife federation has a dual mission to engage in conservation education and to advocate for sound conservation policy.

Environment
11
Sauk Prairie Healthcare Inc

Extraordinary healthcare from the heart - one person at a time.vision: we will set the standard for community-based healthcare that improves the health and quality of life of the people we serve.

Health
12
Winnakee Land Trust Inc

To aid in the protection of natural, agricultural and scenic land resources. the organization holds and monitors land conservation easements, including parks & trails. they also provide expert consulting services to landowners, government…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspirus Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Conservancy of Southwest Florida. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINMAN TRAILS INC: $236,000 · Recreation & SportsWINMAN TRAILS INCFESTIVAL OF TREES: $10,000 · OtherFESTIVAL OF TREESWAUSAU NORDIC SKI CLUB INC: $5,250 · OtherWAUSAU NORDIC SKI…GOOD SHEPHERD: $5,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERDIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant …LAMBO SPUR BIKE TRAIL: $5,000 · OtherLAMBO SPUR BIKE T…Individual grant recipient: $4,665 · OtherIndividual grant …NEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE: $2,500 · OtherNEIGHBORS PLACE I…GIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC: $2,000 · Other+8 more: $6,750 · Other+8 moreHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthEVEREST GRIDIRON INC: $1,000 · EducationNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $650 · Environment
Recreation & Sports$236,000Other$46,165Philanthropy$15,000Health$5,000Education$1,000Environment$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWAUSAU NORDIC SKI CLUB INC: $5,250 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINMAN TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WAUSAU NORDIC SKI CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds EVEREST GRIDIRON INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin IncWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gering Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gering Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gering Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gering Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gering Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph