Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gerborg Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$90kHealth$72kFood & Nutrition$54kEducation$15kInternational$12kArts & Culture$9kHuman Services$9kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$926k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Avon Lake United Church of Christ$28,500
Second Harvest Food Bank of North Central Ohio$5,000
Chalmers Alumni Association$5,000
Greater Cleveland Food Bank$3,000
Cleveland Orchestra$2,500
New Beginnings Church$2,000
Community Resource Services$2,000
Bridging Health International$1,000
The Hope for BEST$1,000
Providence House$1,000
The Carter Center$1,000
Habitat for Humanity$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Oxfam America: $1k → 16%Chalmers Alumni Association: $5k → 8%Doctors without Borders: $3k → 17%Peace River Botanical & Sculpture Gardens: $1k → 9%Harry Chapin Food Bank of Southwest Florida: $4k → 10%ECHO Inc: $2k → 11%Bridging Health International: $1k → 21%Lighthouse Family Retreat: $2k → 13%The Carter Center: $1k → 14%Avon Lake United Church of Christ: $32k → 13%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 17%River Centre Clinic Foundation: $55k → 18%Chalmers Alumni Association: $5k → 8%Harry Chapin Food Bank of Southwest Florida: $2k → 10%ECHO Inc: $2k → 11%The Carter Center: $1k → 14%Avon Lake United Church of Christ: $29k → 13%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 17%River Centre Clinic Foundation: $15k → 18%Chalmers Alumni Association: $5k → 8%Bonita Wonder Gardens: $3k → 11%The Carter Center: $1k → 14%Avon Lake United Church of Christ: $18k → 13%Ideastream Public Media: $1k → 17%Chalmers Alumni Association: $5k → 8%Avon Lake United Church of Christ: $11k → 13%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 17%Avon Lake United Church of Christ: $10k → 13%Avon Lake United Church of Christ: $10k → 13%Avon Lake United Church of Christ: $9k → 13%Providence House: $2k → 17%Community Resource Services: $4k → 13%Community Resource Services: $2k → 13%Community Resource Services: $2k → 13%Greater Cleveland Food Bank: $8k → 17%New Beginnings Church: $2k → 13%Cleveland Food Bank: $8k → 17%Second Harvest Food Bank of North Central Ohio: $5k → 13%Cleveland Food Bank: $8k → 17%Second Harvest Food Bank of North Central Ohio: $5k → 13%Greater Cleveland Food Bank: $6k → 17%Second Harvest Food Bank of North Central Ohio: $3k → 13%Greater Cleveland Food Bank: $5k → 17%Second Harvest Food Bank of North Central Ohio: $2k → 13%Greater Cleveland Food Bank: $3k → 17%Greater Cleveland Food Bank: $3k → 17%Cleveland Orchestra: $3k → 17%Cleveland Orchestra: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
MD
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$306k · 15 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$306k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+42%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalFood & NutritionArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $41k · revenue +8%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO
    4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +25%
  • HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $7k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • LF
    Lighthouse Family Retreat Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +42%
  • CG
    Compel Global
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
3
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
6
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
7
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
8
International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management Inc I

To end hunger and advance sustainable development by 2030 through science and innovation to transform food, land and water systems with aquatic foods for healthier people and planet.

—
9
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
10
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
11
Cedar Lake Inc

Cedar lake, inc. is a passive holding corporation providing structural governance for various subsidiaries, operating in three divisions, each of which conducts distinct and independent operations. the board of directors annually elects…

Health
12
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Cleveland Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Musical Arts Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Avon Lake United Church of Christ: $118,200 · OtherAvon Lake United Church of ChristRiver Centre Clinic Foundation: $70,000 · OtherRiver Centre Clinic FoundationChalmers Alumni Association: $20,000 · OtherChalmers Alumni AssociationCommunity Resource Services: $8,000 · Other+8 more: $14,250 · Other+8 moreGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $40,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD…SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO: $15,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOODBAN…HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $6,500 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK…ECHO Inc: $3,603 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $3,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $1,000 · InternationalThe Musical Arts Association: $6,200 · Arts & CultureBONITA WONDER GARDENS INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureLighthouse Family Retreat Inc: $2,000 · HealthIDEASTREAM: $1,600 · Youth DevelopmentPEACE RIVER BOTANICAL & SCULPTURE GARDEN: $1,000 · Environment
Other$230,450Food & Nutrition$62,000International$10,603Arts & Culture$9,200Health$2,000Youth Development$1,600Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $40,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $6,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetECHO Inc: $3,603 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBONITA WONDER GARDENS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLighthouse Family Retreat Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDEASTREAM: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE RIVER BOTANICAL & SCULPTURE GARDEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ECHO Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BONITA WONDER GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lighthouse Family Retreat Inc ↗
  • Who funds IDEASTREAM ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE RIVER BOTANICAL & SCULPTURE GARDEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gerborg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gerborg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gerborg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph