Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gerald W & Mary a Phillips Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$148kHuman Services$115kHealth$56kCrime & Legal$43kYouth Development$13kHousing & Shelter$6kEducation$5kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$630k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH LENIOR CITY$20,000
WEARS VALLEY RANCH$10,000
CASA OF TENNESSEE VALLEY$6,299
BRIGHTSTONE$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$2,000
AMERICAN LEGION$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
VFW$1,000
MTSU FOUNDATION$1,000
JONI AND FRIENDS- KNOXVILLE$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$1,000
SAMARITAN PURSE$1,000
ASTRODINARY DOBBS FOUNDATION$525
EAST TENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100
THE CHROMOSOME EIGHTEEN REGISTRY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $50 → 12%NARROWGATE FOUNDATION: $100 → 10%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $10k → 12%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $5k → 12%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $5k → 12%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $5k → 12%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $5k → 12%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $5k → 12%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $5k → 12%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $5k → 12%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
CA
NE
MD
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 26 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
18

Total granted

$345k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+19%

Still filing today

54%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEARS VALLEY RANCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • BI
    BRIGHTSTONE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $44k · revenue +171%
  • WC
    WILLIAMSON COUNTY CASA INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CI
    CASA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +21%
  • CU
    CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • DW
    DESTINY WORSHIP CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
5
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
6
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
7
Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
8
Memphis Child Advocacy Center

The mission is to serve children who are victims of sexual and severe physical abuse through prevention, education, and intervention.

Crime & Legal
9
Levi Legacy

At levis legacy, our mission is clear to serve and support families facing the daunting reality of chds, along with the dedicated medical professionals who stand by their side. our mission is not just to weather the storm with them but to…

Youth Development
10
The Victor S Johnson Iii Nashville Children's Alliance Inc

The mission of the nashville children's alliance is healing and justice for children who have been abused or exposed to violence.

Crime & Legal
11
Childrens Center

The mission of childrens center is to support and medically assess children who are suspected victims of abuse or neglect.

Crime & Legal
12
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Williamson County Child Advocacy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH: $79,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCHBRENTWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $57,750 · OtherBRENTWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHWILLIAMSON COUNTY CASA INC: $27,000 · OtherWILLIAMSON COUNTY CASA INCFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH LENIOR CITY: $20,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH LENIOR CITYRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $17,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSENASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $13,000 · Other+38 more: $51,059 · Other+38 moreWEARS VALLEY RANCH INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesWEARS VALLEY R…+2 more: $150 · Human ServicesBRIGHTSTONE INC: $43,644 · EducationBRIGHTSTONE I…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLE…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $11,000 · Crime & LegalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,300 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Health+2 more: $200 · HealthNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $6,200 · Housing & ShelterCASA INC: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$264,809Human Services$50,150Education$47,644Crime & Legal$11,000Health$11,000Housing & Shelter$6,200Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEARS VALLEY RANCH INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBRIGHTSTONE INC: $43,644 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CASA INC: $27,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetNASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $6,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCASA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHIGH HOPES INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPS I Love You Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOZILLA FOUNDATION: $250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEARS VALLEY RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTSTONE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH HOPES INC ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PS I Love You Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hca Healthcare FoundationTN19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hca Healthcare Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Pam Lewis Foundation · The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · Gibson Gives Foundation Dba Gibson Gives · Servant Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gerald W & Mary a Phillips Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gerald W & Mary a Phillips Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gerald W & Mary a Phillips Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph