Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gerald J & Armella M Ring Family Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$7kHuman Services$3kHealth$3kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESTORING ROOTS$500
UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY$500
VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CTR$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DANE COUNTY$500
OPERATION FRESH START INC$500
SACRED HEART SCHOOL$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CTR: $500 → 10%RESTORING ROOTS: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17k · 6 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$17k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-21%
+47%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BLESS OUR PRIESTS RETIREMENT FUND
    5× · 2018–2024 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2018–2024 · $5k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON
    5× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue -27%

Funded once

  • LN
    LITERACY NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Dane County Foundation Inc

The United Way of Dane County Foundation, Inc. exists to support the United Way of Dane County mission: to unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives. By providing a base of support, the Foundation helps United Way…

—
2
Domestic Abuse Intervention Services Inc

Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and advocate for social change through support, education, and outreach.

Human Services
3
Urban Triage Incorporated

Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.

Philanthropy
4
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
5
Wayforward Resources Inc

Wayforward resources, inc. brings our community together to create food and housing security through action and advocacy.

Human Services
6
Hopes Center of Racine Inc

Recognizing the worth and dignity of each person, hopes helps people end their homelessness.

—
7
Madison Area Rehabilitation Centers Inc

Marc, inc. advocates for the full inclusion of all individuals with disabilities in the life of their community. we do so by fostering opportunities for individuals with disabilities to develop a sense of self-worth and dignity, while…

—
8
Cedar Crest Inc

Cedar crest is a life plan retirement community serving adults 55 years of age or older. its mission is to offer residents a faith-based culture that embraces a distinct wellness lifestyle, compassionate supportive living and excellent…

Health
9
District Council of Madison Inc

The district council of madison inc., society of st. vincent de paul is a catholic lay organization in which members join together in friendship to grow spiritually by providing person-to-person services to our neighbors in need.

Human Services
10
Options in Community Living Inc

Options in community living provides support and coordinates services to enable adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live in their own homes. the agency assists people to make informed choices and reach their own…

—
11
Viability Inc

Viability's mission is to build a world in which individuals with disabilities and other disadvantages realize acceptance, inclusion, and access.

Employment
12
Agrace HospiceCare Inc

AGRACE'S MISSION IS Providing personalized care and support, where and when you need it, for life's changing health needs. AGRACE'S VISION IS BUILDING A FUTURE WHERE EVERY PERSON EXPERIENCES extraordinary care and guidance while aging or…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Inc Diocese of Madison; the most unlike its peers is Restoring Roots Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLESS OUR PRIESTS RETIREMENT FUND: $6,000 · OtherBLESS OUR PRIESTS RETIREMENT FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $4,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUR LADY OF HOPE: $700 · OtherOUR LADY OF HOPEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $500 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOL: $450 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $3,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES I…VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $500 · Human ServicesVERA COURT NEIGHBORH…RESTORING ROOTS INC: $500 · Human ServicesRESTORING ROOTS INCCAMP HOPE INC: $2,500 · HealthCAMP HOPE INCAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $400 · HealthAgrace Hospice…LITERACY NETWORK INC: $2,000 · EducationLITERACY N…OPERATION FRESH START INC: $500 · Employment
Other$12,850Human Services$4,000Health$2,900Education$2,000Employment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HOPE INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORING ROOTS INC: $500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOPERATION FRESH START INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gerald J & Armella M Ring Family Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gerald J & Armella M Ring Family Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gerald J & Armella M Ring Family Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph