Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gerald & Dorothy Volm Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$235kYouth Development$196kEducation$72kPhilanthropy$49kRecreation & Sports$22kArts & Culture$16kHealth$13kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF LANGLADE COUNTY$15,000
ASCEND CHURCH$10,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY$5,000
PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,500
IMA HELPS$2,500
IDAHO FALLS LACROSSE CLUB INC$2,500
RED ROBIN SCHOLARSHIP FDN INC$2,000
PALM DESERT COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN$2,000
WILLIAMS HOUSE OF HOPE$1,500
ST PETERS LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,500
PEBBLE CREEK SKI PATROL$1,500
THE GIVING TREE OF LANGLADE COUNTY$1,000
ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WILLIAMS HOUSE OF HOPE: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$580k · 19 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$580k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+23%

Still filing today

53%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthReligionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ANTIGO OPTIMIST CLUB - RED ROBIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +227%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTHWOODS INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $13k · revenue +81%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • AG
    ANTIGO GRIDIRON CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +35%
  • AH
    ANTIGO HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • MH
    MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ludlow Boys and Girls Club Inc Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Boys Girls Club
—
3
Boys & Girls Club of the Wausau Area Inc

To enrich and transform the lives of young people, especially those who need us most.

Youth Development
4
Boys and Girls Clubs of West Central Missouri

The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.

Youth Development
5
Old Timers Athletic Club Inc

This club was organized to promote a spirit of cooperation amoung the members, with particular interest on promotion of organized youth sporting activities

Recreation & Sports
6
Boys & Girls Club of Central Sw Iowa Inc

Inspire and enable young people, including those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Human Services
7
Boys and Girls Club of Glacier Country

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
8
Boys and Girls Clubs of West Central Wis

To enable all young people, especially those who need it most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
9
Boys & Girls Club of Carbon County

The boys & girls club of carbon county was organized to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to become productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

—
10
The Red & White Gridiron Club Inc
Education
11
Boys & Girls Club of the Greater West Plains Area

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive and caring citizens.

Youth Development
12
Antigo Dugout Club Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide an environment for langlade county youth to have an enjoyable, safe, team-oriented, and community based experience while learning how to respect and play the game of baseball. the organization…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Antigo Gridiron Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
7/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP LUTHER INC: $160,000 · OtherCAMP LUTHER INCPEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $123,275 · OtherPEACE LUTHERAN CHURCHST PETER LUTHERAN CHURCH: $91,700 · OtherST PETER LUTHERAN CHURCHPEACE LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherPEACE LUTHERAN SCHOOL+23 more: $75,000 · Other+23 moreUnited Way of Langlade County Inc: $49,000 · PhilanthropyANTIGO OPTIMIST CLUB - RED ROBIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · EducationRenegade Helmet Club CO Brown Armstrong Accountancy Corporat: $6,000 · EducationANTIGO GRIDIRON CLUB INC: $5,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTHWOODS INC: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMED ACCESS INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 · HealthCENTER COURT CLUB INC CENTER COURT CLUB INC: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $3,000 · Human ServicesWILLIAMS HOUSE OF HOPE INCORPORATED: $1,500 · Human Services
Other$504,975Philanthropy$49,000Education$25,000Youth Development$23,000Health$7,500Recreation & Sports$7,000Human Services$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Langlade County Inc: $49,000 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetANTIGO OPTIMIST CLUB - RED ROBIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTHWOODS INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLanglade County Historical Society Inc: $10,500 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER COURT CLUB INC CENTER COURT CLUB INC: $7,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetMED ACCESS INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetRenegade Helmet Club CO Brown Armstrong Accountancy Corporat: $6,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetANTIGO GRIDIRON CLUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWILLIAMS HOUSE OF HOPE INCORPORATED: $1,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetActs 18 Ministry Incorporated: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWOODS TRACTOR CLUB INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Way of Langlade County Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTIGO OPTIMIST CLUB - RED ROBIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds Langlade County Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER COURT CLUB INC CENTER COURT CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds MED ACCESS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Renegade Helmet Club CO Brown Armstrong Accountancy Corporat ↗
  • Who funds ANTIGO GRIDIRON CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22 ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMS HOUSE OF HOPE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Acts 18 Ministry Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOODS TRACTOR CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN BRAILLE WORKERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robert a & Cynthia L Hilger FoundationCA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robert a & Cynthia L Hilger Foundation · Elwyn Remington Foundation · Charles George Resch II Memorial Foundation Inc · Andy L & Leone Sheldon Charitable Tr · Covantage Credit Union · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gerald & Dorothy Volm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gerald & Dorothy Volm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gerald & Dorothy Volm Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Gerald & Dorothy Volm Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gerald & Dorothy Volm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph