Skip to content
Georgia Tennis Association Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Georgia Tennis Association Inc

The association's mission to promote and develop the growth the tennis is only enhanced by leveraging diversity and creating an inclusive environment.

$425k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$94k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$477k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $287,419, the rows itemized in this filing. The $425,192 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $137,773 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $94k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY GROWTH AND PARTICIPATION GRANT (STA)$94,215
ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION$36,750
COLUMBUS REGIONAL TENNIS ASSOCIATION$23,248
CENTRAL SAVANNAH RIVER TENNIS ASSOCIATION$13,820
CLARKE OCONEE TENNIS ASSOCIATION$12,226
ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS FOUNDATION$11,027
SAVANNAH AREA TENNIS ASSOCIATION$10,263
SOUTHERN CRESCENT TENNIS ASSOCIATION$8,211
CHATTAHOOCHEE AREA TENNIS ASSOCIATION$7,368
COOSA VALLEY TENNIS ASSOCIATION$7,000
MACON AREA TENNIS ASSOCIATION$7,000
SPECIAL POPULATIONS TENNIS PROGRAM$7,000
GOLDEN ISLES TENNIS ASSOCIATION$7,000
COAN TENNIS ASSOCIATION$7,000
BAINBRIDGE TENNIS ASSOCIATION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 28% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SOUTHERN CRESCENT TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 6%CLARKE OCONEE TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $12k → 6%CENTRAL SAVANNAH RIVER TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $14k → 7%GEORGIA TENNIS FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%COMMUNITY GROWTH AND PARTICIPATION GRANT (STA): $94k → 9%SOUTH ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $7k → 13%COAN TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%GOLDEN ISLES TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%TENNIS VALDOSTA: $6k → 15%CHATTAHOOCHEE AREA TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $7k → 18%MACH ACADEMY INC: $7k → 18%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $44k → 9%SPECIAL POPULATIONS TENNIS PROGRAM: $7k → 13%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $16k → 14%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $37k → 9%ATLANTA TENNIS CHAMPIONSHIPS: $20k → 13%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $14k → 14%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $26k → 9%ATLANTA TENNIS CHAMPIONSHIPS: $20k → 13%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOC (USTA): $24k → 9%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $19k → 9%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS FOUNDATION: $11k → 9%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tri County Community Tennis Association

Promotes, develops, and introduces usta to locations in ms

Recreation & Sports
2
Crossroads Tennis Association
—
3
Florence Tennis Association

To promote the growth and development of tennis

Recreation & Sports
4
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
5
American Tennis Association

To develop, promote, and showcase opportunities through tennis

Recreation & Sports
6
Memphis Tennis Association

Memphis Tennis Association is organized to promote the development of tennis as a means of healthful recreation and physical fitness; to establish and maintain rules of fair play and high standards of sportsmanship; and to further the…

Recreation & Sports
7
Georgia Tennis Association Inc

The association's mission to promote and develop the growth the tennis is only enhanced by leveraging diversity and creating an inclusive environment. we are committed to ensuring that people of all backgrounds have access to and feel…

—
8
Lexington Area Tennis Association

To promote the growth of youth and adult tennis in lexington county.

Recreation & Sports
9
Lowcountry Tennis Association

To promote interest in the game of tennis, to support the usta league in teh charleston and surrounding area.

Recreation & Sports
10
Raleigh Tennis Association

Raleigh tennis association's mission is to promote and grow the game of tennis in the raleigh, north carolina area as a means of healthy recreational activity and physical fitness; to foster a lifetime love of the game of tennis and to do…

Recreation & Sports
11
United States Tennis Association Incorporated

The usta mission is growing tennis to inspire healthier people and communities everywhere.usta is the national governing body for the sport of tennis and the recognized leader in promoting and developing the sport's growth on every level…

—
12
United States Tennis Association Inc

To promote the development of tennis as a means of healthful recreation and physical fitness and to foster amateur tennis tournaments and competition.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Community Tennis Association; the most unlike its peers is Berry College Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $180,498 · OtherATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATIONSOUTHERN TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $94,215 · OtherSOUTHERN TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCATLANTA TENNIS CHAMPIONSHIPS: $40,000 · OtherATLANTA TENNIS CHAMPIONSHIPS+7 more: $46,733 · Other+7 moreCOLUMBUS REGIONAL TENNIS ASSN INC: $23,248 · Recreation & SportsCOLUMBUS REGIONAL TENN…Central Savannah River Area Tennis Assoc: $13,820 · Recreation & SportsCentral Savannah River…CLARKE OCONEE TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $12,226 · Recreation & SportsCLARKE OCONEE TENNIS A…SOUTHERN CRESCENT TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $8,211 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHERN CRESCENT TENN…SPECIAL POPULATIONS TENNIS PROGRAM INC: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL POPULATIONS TE…MACH ACADEMY INC: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsMACH ACADEMY INCMACON AREA TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsMACON AREA TENNIS ASSO…South Atlanta Community Tennis: $6,650 · Recreation & SportsSouth Atlanta Communit…ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS FOUNDATION: $5,350 · Recreation & SportsATLANTA COMMUNITY TENN…GEORGIA TENNIS FOUNDATION INC: $3,276 · Recreation & SportsSAVANNAH AREA TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $21,290 · Public Benefit
Other$361,446Recreation & Sports$93,781Public Benefit$21,290

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $180,498 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetSOUTHERN TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $94,215 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLUMBUS REGIONAL TENNIS ASSN INC: $23,248 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSAVANNAH AREA TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $21,290 over 2y, 12% of budgetCentral Savannah River Area Tennis Assoc: $13,820 over 2y, 12% of budgetCLARKE OCONEE TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $12,226 over 2y, 18% of budgetSPECIAL POPULATIONS TENNIS PROGRAM INC: $7,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetMACH ACADEMY INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOOSA VALLEY TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetMACON AREA TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSouth Atlanta Community Tennis: $6,650 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS FOUNDATION: $5,350 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGEORGIA TENNIS FOUNDATION INC: $3,276 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United States Tennis …Southern Tennis Assoc…Usta Foundation Incor…Amazonsmile Foundation
United States Tennis Association IncorporatedNY17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United States Tennis Association Incorporated · Southern Tennis Association Inc · Usta Foundation Incorporated · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Georgia Tennis Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Georgia Tennis Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Georgia Tennis Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home