Skip to content

· Private foundation

Georgia Ornithological Society Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$139k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$494kAnimals$242kScience & Tech$173kEducation$48kRecreation & Sports$6kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$5,681
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES$53,050
THE NATURE CONSERVACY OF GEORGIA$42,000
UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$30,000
BIRDS GEORGIA$5,681
SWALLOW CONSERVATION$5,000
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$1,825
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SWALLOW CONSERVATION: $5k → 14%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $3k → 16%MIGRATORY SHOREBIRD RESEARCH FUND: $8k → 16%TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH STATION: $16k → 19%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 20%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%GEORGIA AUDUBON SOCIETY: $42k → 13%THE ORIANNE SOCIETY: $22k → 13%WILD NEST BIRD REHAB: $16k → 14%BERRY COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY: $35k → 15%JW JONES ECOLOGIOCAL RESEARCH CENTER: $36k → 22%GEORGIA SOUTHERN RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 24%GEORGIA COLLEGE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 24%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 27%AMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION: $3k → 9%TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH STATION: $15k → 19%ATLANTA AUDUBON SOCIETY: $21k → 13%BERRY COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY: $5k → 15%GEORGIA SOUTHERN RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATION: $3k → 24%GEORGIA COLLEGE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 24%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $23k → 27%AMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION: $2k → 9%ATLANTA AUDUBON SOCIETY: $20k → 13%GEORGIA SOUTHERN RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATION: $3k → 24%GEORGIA COLLEGE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 24%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $20k → 27%AMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION: $2k → 9%ATLANTA AUDUBON SOCIETY: $19k → 13%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $17k → 27%ATLANTA AUDUBON SOCIETY: $6k → 13%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $13k → 27%GEORGIA AUDUBON SOCIETY: $5k → 13%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $9k → 27%BIRDS GEORGIA: $43k → 13%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6k → 27%BIRDS GEORGIA: $6k → 13%UGA POULTRY SCIENCE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 27%BIRDS GEORGIA: $5k → 13%UGA FOUNDATION TREANOR HOUSE: $5k → 27%GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: $53k → 13%UGA WARNELL SCHOOL: $2k → 27%GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: $40k → 13%GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: $25k → 13%THE NATURE CONSERVACY OF GEORGIA: $50k → 13%THE NATURE CONSERVACY OF GEORGIA: $50k → 13%THE NATURE CONSERVACY OF GEORGIA: $42k → 13%THE NATURE CONSERVACY OF GEORGIA: $17k → 13%THE NATURE CONSERVACY OF GEORGIA: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CO
NC
SC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$698k · 13 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
22

Total granted

$698k
$264k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+146%

Still filing today

31%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Birds Georgia Corporation
    5× · 2019–2025 · $119k · revenue +179%
  • UO
    University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $118k · revenue +79%
  • AB
    AMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • GL
    GEORGIA-ALABAMA LAND TRUST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +171%
  • JJ
    JW JONES ECOLOGIOCAL RESEARCH CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $36k
  • TO
    THE ORIANNE SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue +146%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waterbird Society

The waterbird society is composed of biologists, researchers, conservationists, students, and others interested in the behavior, ecology, and conservation of waterbirds. the organization is administered by officers and council members…

—
2
American Bird Conservancy

American Bird Conservancy (ABC) takes bold action to conserve wild birds and their habitats throughout the Americas. Inspired by the wonder of birds, we achieve lasting results for the bird species most in need while also benefiting human…

Animals
3
American Ornithological Society

See schedule othe american ornithological society (aos) is an international membership organization that connects ornithologists, science, and bird conservation by supporting science that advances the understanding and conservation of…

Science & Tech
4
Alabama Audubon

Alabama audubon's mission is to promote conservation and a greater knowledge of birds, their habitats, and the natural world.

Environment
5
Ornithological Council

The Ornithological Council is a consortium of scientific societies of ornithologists. The research conducted by their members spans the globe and their cumulative expertise comprises the knowledge that is fundamental and essential to…

Animals
6
Avian Research & Conservation Institute Inc

To engage in wildlife research and conservation in the public interest; to manage, preserve, and restore plant and animal species; to make research results available to the public for their use and education; to implement research, analyze…

Environment
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Michigan Audubon Society

To foster and promote appreciation and understanding of the natural world by educational, scientific, investigative, literary, philanthropic and charitable pursuits. michigan audubon connects birds and people for the benefit of both…

Environment
9
Georgia Conservancy Inc

To protect georgia through ecological and economic solutions for stewardship, conservation, and sustainable use of the land and its resources.

Environment
10
George Miksch Sutton Avian Research Center Inc

The organization promotes conservation, education, and research of endangered, rare, and understudied birds.

Animals
11
Florida Audubon Society Inc

Natural resource protection through conservation of wildlife, preservation of habitat, including clean air and water, and prudent growth management for sustained quality of life.

Environment
12
The Houston Audubon Society

To advance the conservation of birds and their habitats in the Greater Houston Gulf Coast region by acquiring and maintaining critical habitat as bird sanctuaries, providing education programs and nature experiences, and advocating policy…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birds Georgia Corporation; the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVACY OF GEORGIA: $165,422 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVACY OF GEORGIAGEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: $118,187 · OtherGEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESGEORGIA AUDUBON SOCIETY: $47,049 · OtherGEORGIA AUDUBON SOCIETYBERRY COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY: $39,725 · OtherBERRY COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGYJW JONES ECOLOGIOCAL RESEARCH CENTER: $36,000 · OtherJW JONES ECOLOGIOCAL RESEARCH CENTERTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH STATION: $31,830 · OtherTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH STATIONGEORGIA COLLEGE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $25,008 · Other+21 more: $59,703 · Other+21 moreGEORGIA-ALABAMA LAND TRUST INC: $150,000 · EnvironmentGEORGIA-ALABAMA LAND TRUST INCBirds Georgia Corporation: $118,988 · EnvironmentBirds Georgia Corporation+1 more: $4,665 · EnvironmentUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $117,982 · EducationUniversity of …+1 more: $4,000 · EducationTHE ORIANNE SOCIETY: $22,000 · AnimalsWILD NEST BIRD REHAB: $15,607 · AnimalsAMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION: $11,103 · Animals
Other$522,924Environment$273,653Education$121,982Animals$48,710

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGIA-ALABAMA LAND TRUST INC: $150,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetBirds Georgia Corporation: $118,988 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $117,982 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ORIANNE SOCIETY: $22,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWILD NEST BIRD REHAB: $15,607 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetAMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION: $11,103 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $4,665 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGIA-ALABAMA LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Birds Georgia Corporation ↗
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ORIANNE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WILD NEST BIRD REHAB ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Fish and Wildlife FoundationDC13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Georgia Ornithological Society Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Georgia Ornithological Society Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Georgia Ornithological Society Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Georgia Ornithological Society Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Georgia Ornithological Society’s filings →

    More from the funding graph