· Public charity
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of GEORGIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $89k
- $50k–250k42 grants · $3.9M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $439,490 |
| JUVENILE COURT OF COBBCASA | $363,215 |
| ATLANTA CASA | $318,750 |
| ACTION PACT | $233,650 |
| GWINNETT CO BD OF COMM | $223,430 |
| CHILD ENRICHMENT INC | $202,987 |
| Individual grant recipient | $185,426 |
| LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA | $157,628 |
| Individual grant recipient | $155,348 |
| Individual grant recipient | $135,333 |
| CASA GLYNN | $132,557 |
| Individual grant recipient | $111,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $109,150 |
| ADVOCATES FOR BARTOWS CHILDR | $101,023 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,973 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $586k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
56 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECHILD ENRICHMENT INC9× · 2017–2025 · $911k · revenue +187%
- CGCASA GLYNN INC9× · 2017–2025 · $801k · revenue +27% · 44% of their budget
- AFADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC9× · 2017–2025 · $709k · revenue +250%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $31k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dougherty County CASA, Inc. supports children who have experienced abuse or neglect by providing specially trained community volunteers to advocate for their best interests -- promoting their safety, stability, and permanent connections to…
Child Advocacy Services
Central georgia casa provides high quality volunteer advocacy to child victims of abuse and neglect who have been adjudicated dependent by the juvenile court and placed in foster care. providing this high-quality volunteer advocacy…
The mission DeKalb County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA)is to recruit, screen, train and supervise court-appointed volunteers who advocate for the best interests of children who are in the care of the DeKalb County Juvenile Court…
Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.
Recruit and train community volunteers to speak out for abused and neglected children in court proceedings so that they can be permanently placed in a safe, nuturing enviroment as quickly as possible.
Protect abused and neglected children.
To provide all abused and neglected children with a voice in the court process.
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
A Childs Place CASA Ltd. recruits screens trains & supervises CASA Volunteers to advocate on behalf of abused and neglected children.
To recruit, train and supervise community volunteers to advocate for children/youth who have experienced abuse and/or neglect who are within the legal jurisdiction of the state.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockdale Casa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Never Lost Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ATLANTA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ENRICHMENT INC ↗
- Who funds CASA GLYNN INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION PACT INC ↗
- Who funds LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA INC LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA INC ↗
- Who funds ENOTAH CASA INC ↗
- Who funds OCMULGEE CASA INC ↗
- Who funds ATHENS-OCONEE CASA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds COWETA CASA INC ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT CASA INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKDALE CASA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ALCOVY CASA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS VOICE CASA INC ↗
- Who funds COASTAL PLAIN CASA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS HAVEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.