Skip to content

· Public charity

Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc.

$5.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$439k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$27MCivil Rights$2.7MHuman Services$1.5M
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k42 grants · $3.9M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$74,340
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$439,490
JUVENILE COURT OF COBBCASA$363,215
ATLANTA CASA$318,750
ACTION PACT$233,650
GWINNETT CO BD OF COMM$223,430
CHILD ENRICHMENT INC$202,987
Individual grant recipient$185,426
LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA$157,628
Individual grant recipient$155,348
Individual grant recipient$135,333
CASA GLYNN$132,557
Individual grant recipient$111,600
Individual grant recipient$109,150
ADVOCATES FOR BARTOWS CHILDR$101,023
Individual grant recipient$100,973
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $586k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA: $158k → 11%LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA: $108k → 11%LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA: $52k → 11%LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA: $48k → 11%LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA: $48k → 11%LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA: $48k → 11%LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA: $44k → 11%LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA: $42k → 11%LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA: $39k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31M · 56 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

56 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
2

Total granted

$31M
$44k

Still filing today

32%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CHILD ENRICHMENT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $911k · revenue +187%
  • CG
    CASA GLYNN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $801k · revenue +27% · 44% of their budget
  • AF
    ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $709k · revenue +250%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $31k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dougherty County Casa Inc

Dougherty County CASA, Inc. supports children who have experienced abuse or neglect by providing specially trained community volunteers to advocate for their best interests -- promoting their safety, stability, and permanent connections to…

Civil Rights
2
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
4
Central Georgia Casa Inc

Central georgia casa provides high quality volunteer advocacy to child victims of abuse and neglect who have been adjudicated dependent by the juvenile court and placed in foster care. providing this high-quality volunteer advocacy…

Civil Rights
5
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Camden County Inc

Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.

—
6
Casa of Johnson County Inc

Recruit and train community volunteers to speak out for abused and neglected children in court proceedings so that they can be permanently placed in a safe, nuturing enviroment as quickly as possible.

Crime & Legal
7
Court Appointed Special Advocate of Humboldt

To provide all abused and neglected children with a voice in the court process.

Civil Rights
8
Gulf Coast Casa

Protect abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
9
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
10
A Childs Place Casa Ltd

A Childs Place CASA Ltd. recruits screens trains & supervises CASA Volunteers to advocate on behalf of abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
11
Casa of the Rolling Plains

Casa is a program to advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal and foster system.

Crime & Legal
12
Casa for Kids Inc

To promote and support professionally trained Court Appointed Special Advocates for abused and neglected children in need of safety, stability, and permanency, brought to the attention of the Juvenile Courts, giving them the opportunity to…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockdale Casa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Never Lost Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $3,039,641 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUVENILE COURT OF COBBCASA: $980,324 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $912,805 · OtherGWINNETT CO BD OF COMM: $854,403 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $820,204 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $791,857 · Other+39 more: $13,394,408 · Other+39 moreATLANTA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $1,619,750 · Civil RightsATLANTA COURT APPO…CASA GLYNN INC: $801,110 · Civil RightsCASA GLYNN INCENOTAH CASA INC: $550,110 · Civil RightsENOTAH CASA INCCOWETA CASA INC: $522,958 · Civil RightsCOWETA CASA INCPIEDMONT CASA INC: $511,963 · Civil RightsPIEDMONT CASA INCROCKDALE CASA INC: $485,452 · Civil RightsROCKDALE CASA INCTHE CHILDRENS HAVEN INC: $377,859 · Civil RightsTHE CHILDRENS HAVE…NEVER LOST INC: $320,467 · Civil RightsNEVER LOST INCCHILD ENRICHMENT INC: $910,832 · Crime & LegalCHILD ENRIC…OCMULGEE CASA INC: $531,079 · Crime & LegalOCMULGEE CA…ATHENS-OCONEE CASA INCORPORATED: $525,822 · Crime & LegalATHENS-OCON…FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL INC: $467,729 · Crime & LegalFAMILY SUPP…CHILDRENS VOICE CASA INC: $433,472 · Crime & LegalCHILDRENS V…COASTAL PLAIN CASA INC: $406,857 · Crime & LegalCOASTAL PLA…LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA INC LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA INC: $586,217 · Human Services
Other$22,043,642Civil Rights$5,189,669Crime & Legal$3,275,791Human Services$586,217

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATLANTA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $1,619,750 over 5y, 42% of budgetCHILD ENRICHMENT INC: $910,832 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetCASA GLYNN INC: $801,110 over 9y, 44% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC: $708,581 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetACTION PACT INC: $657,410 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetLOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA INC LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA INC: $586,217 over 9y, 76% of budgetENOTAH CASA INC: $550,110 over 9y, 13% of budgetOCMULGEE CASA INC: $531,079 over 9y, 19% of budgetATHENS-OCONEE CASA INCORPORATED: $525,822 over 9y, 15% of budgetCOWETA CASA INC: $522,958 over 9y, 29% of budgetPIEDMONT CASA INC: $511,963 over 9y, 22% of budgetROCKDALE CASA INC: $485,452 over 9y, 21% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL INC: $467,729 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetALCOVY CASA INC: $461,843 over 9y, 24% of budgetCHILDRENS VOICE CASA INC: $433,472 over 9y, 31% of budgetCOASTAL PLAIN CASA INC: $406,857 over 9y, 15% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS HAVEN INC: $377,859 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetNEVER LOST INC: $320,467 over 5y, 17% of budgetTRI-COUNTY CASA INC: $281,648 over 6y, 62% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATLANTA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ENRICHMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA GLYNN INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION PACT INC ↗
  • Who funds LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA INC LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds ENOTAH CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds OCMULGEE CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds ATHENS-OCONEE CASA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds COWETA CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKDALE CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALCOVY CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS VOICE CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL PLAIN CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS HAVEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundation IncGA22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates’ filings →

    More from the funding graph