Skip to content

· Private foundation

George T Bruckman Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2021
15
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$12kEducation$12kPhilanthropy$5kHealth$4kInternational$4kHuman Services$2kFood & Nutrition$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2021 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$738k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Congregation Shir Shalom$4,000
UJA Federation of NY$3,000
Jewish National Fund - USA$2,500
Congregation Kneses Tifereth Israel$2,300
Memorial Sloane Kettering Cancer C$2,000
Congregation Kol Ami$1,000
Ridgefield Visiting Nurse Assoc$1,000
Band of Parents - Bound by Hope$1,000
Danbury Animal Welfare Society$1,000
Syracuse University - Veterans$1,000
American Jewish Committee$1,000
Food Bank for Westchester County$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Mental Health America$1,000
Daily Bread Food Pantry - Danbury$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Food Bank for Westchester County: $1k → 9%Syracuse University - Veterans: $1k → 14%Mental Health America: $1k → 14%UJA Federation of NY: $3k → 17%Jewish Federation of Palm Beach: $1k → 11%Danbury Animal Welfare Society: $1k → 9%Congregation Kneses Tifereth Israel: $2k → 9%Syracuse University: $11k → 14%Jewish National Fund - USA: $3k → 17%Daily Bread Food Pantry - Danbury: $1k → 9%Congregation Kol Ami: $1k → 9%Jewish National Fund: $1k → 17%Congregation Mt Moses: $1k → 9%Congregation Kol Ami: $1k → 9%see attached: $63k → 17%Congregation Shir Shalom: $4k → 9%Family Service of Westchester: $1k → 9%See attached: $35k → 17%Congregation Shir Shalom: $4k → 9%see attached: $32k → 17%Ridgefield Visiting Nurse Assoc: $1k → 9%Band of Parents - Bound by Hope: $1k → 17%Memorial Sloane Kettering Cancer C: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14k · 3 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$14k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+63%

Still filing today

33%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
EducationPhilanthropyInternationalAnimalsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Congregation Shir Shalom
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +46%
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KOL AMI
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k

Funded once

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +29%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
The Jerusalem Connection
—
6
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
7
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
8
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
10
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
11
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
12
Sherit Isroel
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Danbury Animal Welfare Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Congregation Shir Shalom: $8,000 · OtherCongregation Shir ShalomCONGREGATION KNESES TIFERETH ISRAEL: $2,300 · OtherCONGREGATION KNESES TIFERETH ISRAELMemorial Sloane Kettering Cancer C: $2,000 · OtherMemorial Sloane Kettering Cancer CCONGREGATION KOL AMI: $2,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KOL AMIRVNAHEALTH INC: $1,000 · OtherBand of Parents - Bound by Hope: $1,000 · OtherSyracuse University - Veterans: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC: $1,000 · OtherDaily Bread Food Pantry - Danbury: $1,000 · OtherFood Bank for Westchester County: $1,000 · OtherMental Health America: $1,000 · OtherSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWIS…JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDER…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $2,500 · InternationalJEWISH NA…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 · InternationalJEWISH NA…DANBURY ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $1,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$22,300Education$11,000Philanthropy$5,000International$3,500Animals$1,000Civil Rights$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANBURY ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRVNAHEALTH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George T Bruckman Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George T Bruckman Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Rvnahealth Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George T Bruckman Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to George T Bruckman Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $63k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George T Bruckman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph