Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George R Wiley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$434kAnimals$64kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kCrime & Legal$21kEnvironment$17kHuman Services$14kEmployment$9kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $83k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$679k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA JONSSON CANCER CNTR$42,500
ROOSTER FOUNDATION$25,300
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL$15,000
CASA OF ORANGE COUNTY$7,950
OCEANA$6,000
WORKING WARDROBES$5,300
TARA'S CHANCE$5,000
DENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN$5,000
TUSTIN AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$90
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$570k · 9 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$570k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+79%

Still filing today

56%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitCivil RightsEnvironmentEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +23%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BUENA PARK
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +62%
  • TP
    THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • MA
    MAKE A WISH ORANGE COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • BM
    BALBOA MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +85%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
2
California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association

California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…

Civil Rights
3
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
4
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

5
Chac Fka Community Health Awareness Council

Chac seeks to improve lives and strengthen communities through access to comprehensive and culturally responsive mental health services in northern santa clara county.

Health
6
Children's Law Center of California

Children's law center of california (clc) provides legal representation for children and youth impacted by abuse and neglect. we advocate for our clients by supporting families; fighting for reunification, permanence, educational…

7
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
8
Tolosa Children's Dental Center of San Luis Obispo County

To provide dental services for underprivileged children in san luis obispo county.

Youth Development
9
Casa of Ventura County Inc

Court appointed special advocates (casa) of ventura county believe that every court-dependent abused or neglected child should be safe, have permanence and the opportunity to thrive and have a strong compassionate volunteer advocate.

Crime & Legal
10
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
11
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Santa Cruz County

CASA of Santa Cruz advocates for children and youth, providing court appointed volunteers so each child in the dependency and juvenile court system feels cared for and connected with the people, families and resources they need to heal and…

Civil Rights
12
Casa of Los Angeles

Our mission is to mobilize community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse and neglect. our vision is a los angeles where every child in the welfare system has an advocate and the opportunity to thrive.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital of Orange County and the most unlike its peers is California Highway Patrol. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UCLA JONSSON CANCER CNTR — $420,205 · OtherUCLA JONSSON CANCER CNTRROOSTER FOUNDATION — $64,170 · OtherROOSTER FOUNDATION+8 more — $29,180 · Other+8 moreCALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BUENA PARK — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY — $20,085 · Civil RightsOCEANA INC — $17,150 · EnvironmentWorking Wardrobes For A New Start — $9,300 · EmploymentTARAS CHANCE — $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY — $1,250 · HealthDENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$513,555Youth Development$31,000Civil Rights$20,085Environment$17,150Employment$9,300Health$8,750Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY — $20,085 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC — $17,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWorking Wardrobes For A New Start — $9,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BUENA PARK — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSADDLEBACK COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE — $2,330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWPORT BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION — $260 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTUSTIN AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $90 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization George R Wiley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph