Skip to content

· Private foundation

George R Wallace Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$318k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHousing & Shelter$815kArts & Culture$443kHuman Services$413kHealth$367kFood & Nutrition$116kAnimals$70kCommunity Improvement$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHSTAR FAMILY SERVICES INC$60,000
YMCA OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS$50,000
APPLE WILD SCHOOL$25,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$25,000
St Bernard's Elementary School$25,000
FITCHBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY$20,000
Easterseals of Massachusetts$15,000
Mount Wachusett Community College$15,000
UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH$10,000
ST BERNARD'S HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
CLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS NEW ENGLAND$10,000
GROTON HILL MUSIC$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $479k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YWCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS: $5k → 11%Rise Above: $5k → 11%NORTHSTAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $120k → 11%NORTHSTAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $60k → 11%NORTHSTAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $60k → 11%GINNY'S HELPING HAND INC: $36k → 11%GINNY'S HELPING HANDS: $35k → 11%GINNY'S HELPING HANDS: $35k → 11%MONTACHUSETT OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $28k → 11%MONTACHUSETT INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY: $15k → 11%NORTHSTAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%NORTHSTAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%MONTACHUSETT INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY: $10k → 11%NORTHSTAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%NORTHSTAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%THE SPANISH AMERICAN CENTER INC: $5k → 11%MAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 34 repeat orgs$450k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
23

Total granted

$3.1M
$390k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
-6%

Still filing today

50%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEWVUE COMMUNITIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $400k · revenue +90%
  • NS
    NORTH STAR FAMILY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $305k · revenue +190%
  • FH
    FITCHBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +76% · 94% of their budget

Funded once

  • YO
    YWCA OF CNTRAL MASSACHUSETTS
    one grant, 2023 · $55k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • TA
    THE ARC OF OPPORTUNITY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Historic Boston Incorporated
—
2
Holliston Historical Society
—
3
Brownstone Gardens Ii Inc

Low income elderly housing.

—
4
Worcester Art Museum

To connect people, communities, and cultures through experience of art. collect the most significant works of art available in an effort to shape the quality/scope of the permanent collection while adhering to the institution's…

Arts & Culture
5
Worcester Common Ground Inc

To establish and maintain housing for low and moderate income families in the Worcester area. Worcester Common Ground also provides income eligible individuals the opportunity to be homeowners.

Housing & Shelter
6
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
7
Worcester Comm Housing Resource Inc

Worcester Community Housing Resources' mission is to help create and preserve affordable housing and to initiate and support neighborhood revitalization in the greater Worcester area. Since 1994 we have proven ourselves to be a successful…

—
8
Newvue Affordable Housing Corporation

Newvue affordable housing corporation is a nonprofit organization that develops and provides affordable housing to low and moderate income households in north central massachusetts.

—
9
Neighborhood Housing Services of the South Shore Inc

Neighborworks housing solutions provides neighborhood revitalization through promoting, developing and maintaining affordable housing in southeastern massachusetts

Housing & Shelter
10
Harvard Historical Society

To collect and preserve historical material and artifacts, to encourage research into local history and to offer historical education opportunities to the community

Arts & Culture
11
The Cambridge Homes
—
12
North End Historical Society Inc

To collect and preserve the historical record and material culture of boston's north end. also to catalog and present these resources through publications, lectures, educational programs and exhibits.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Neighbors of Fitchburg Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clinton Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $308,000 · OtherFITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITYFITCHBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $200,000 · OtherFITCHBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETYFITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE: $200,000 · OtherFITCHBURG STATE COLLEGEST BERNARD'S ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $119,000 · OtherST BERNARD'S ELEMENTARY SCHOOLYMCA OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS: $100,000 · OtherDECISERO KAREN'S CLOSET ENDOWMENT: $80,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $80,000 · Other+38 more: $953,973 · Other+38 moreNORTH STAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $305,000 · Human ServicesNORTH STAR FAMI…GINNY'S HELPING HAND INC: $106,000 · Human ServicesGINNY'S HELPING…MAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC: $53,000 · Human ServicesMAKING OPPORTUN…+3 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesNEWVUE COMMUNITIES INC: $400,000 · Housing & ShelterNEWVUE COMMU…EASTER SEALS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $140,000 · HealthEASTER SE…Heywood Healthcare Inc: $75,000 · HealthHeywood H…COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC: $54,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY…THE VIRGINIA THURSTON HEALING GARDEN INC: $27,500 · HealthTHE VIRGI…APPLEWILD SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $115,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE CUSHING ACADEMY: $40,000 · EducationMount Wachusett Community College Foundation Inc: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationGROTON HILL MUSIC INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureFITCHBURG ART MUSEUM: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNEW PLAYERS THEATRE GUILD INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS NEW ENGLAND INC: $40,000 · Public Benefit
Other$2,040,973Human Services$479,000Housing & Shelter$400,000Health$296,500Education$172,500Arts & Culture$125,000Public Benefit$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEWVUE COMMUNITIES INC: $400,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetNORTH STAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $305,000 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetFITCHBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $200,000 over 7y, 94% of budgetEASTER SEALS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $140,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAPPLEWILD SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $115,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGINNY'S HELPING HAND INC: $106,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetGROTON HILL MUSIC INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC: $54,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC: $53,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLINTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 2y, 65% of budgetFITCHBURG ART MUSEUM: $50,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED NEIGHBORS OF FITCHBURG INC: $48,900 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE CUSHING ACADEMY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS NEW ENGLAND INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES FOR HOPE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE VIRGINIA THURSTON HEALING GARDEN INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetLUNENBURG SKATE PARK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetBERNARDIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetTHE STRATTON PLAYERS INC: $16,600 over 1y, 17% of budgetMount Wachusett Community College Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWESTMINSTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $13,360 over 1y, 43% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CROCKER FIELD RESTORATION COMMITTEE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetNEW PLAYERS THEATRE GUILD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetYWCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPANISH AMERICAN CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUp With Books Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEWVUE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STAR FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FITCHBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds APPLEWILD SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GINNY'S HELPING HAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Heywood Healthcare Inc ↗
  • Who funds GROTON HILL MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC ↗
  • Who funds CLINTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FITCHBURG ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEIGHBORS OF FITCHBURG INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE CUSHING ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VIRGINIA THURSTON HEALING GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LUNENBURG SKATE PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds BERNARDIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEOMINSTER ART ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Central MaMA53× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Central Ma · Douglas & Isabelle Crocker Foundation · Rollstone Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of North Central Mass Inc · Avidia Charitable Foundation Inc · Hometown Bank Community Foundation Inc · The Nypro Foundation Inc co Nypro Inc · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Main Street Group Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Reliant Foundation Inc · Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George R Wallace Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George R Wallace Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Clear Path for Veterans New England Inc: 100% of income from government
  • North Star Family Services Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Community Health Connections Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Easter Seals Massachusetts Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Spanish American Center Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Making Opportunity Count Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Newvue Communities Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Community Harvest Project Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Fitchburg Historical Society: 24% of income from government
  • Ginny's Helping Hand Inc: 23% of income from government
  • New Players Theatre Guild Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Fitchburg Art Museum: 2% of income from government
  • Groton Hill Music Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George R Wallace Foundation?

Find your warmest path to George R Wallace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George R Wallace’s filings →

More from the funding graph