Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George Mavridis Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$246kHealth$197kEmployment$116kCivil Rights$27kCommunity Improvement$12kHousing & Shelter$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $195k
$550
Median grant
7
States reached
$445k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL$65,000
TAILORED FOR SUCCESS$65,000
ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI$65,000
MALDEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF$2,000
VOICE OF REASON (VOR)$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,100
BROOKSBY VILLAGE SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,050
BROOKSBY VILLAGE CATHOLIC FUND$1,000
CLERGY TRUST FUND$1,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MA$550
MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION$480
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$450
MARCH OF DIMES$400
CARTER CENTER FOR CHILDREN$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARTER CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $400 → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $300 → 10%CARTER CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $350 → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $150 → 10%TAILORED FOR SUCCESS: $65k → 8%TAILORED FOR SUCCESS: $25k → 8%TAILORED FOR SUCCESS: $25k → 8%TAILORED FOR SUCCESS: $350 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
CO
VA
KS
TN
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 33% of George Mavridis Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 67% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

George Mavridis Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$464k · 27 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
10

Total granted

$464k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+35%

Still filing today

56%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    3× · 2020–2023 · $120k · revenue +39%
  • TF
    Tailored For Success Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $116k · revenue +107% · 42% of their budget
  • BV
    BROOKSBY VILLAGE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • TI
    TILL INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

6
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
12
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cofar Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $161,200 · OtherENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONTUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL — $65,000 · OtherTUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTALENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI — $65,000 · OtherENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNICONCERNED ADVOCATES OF NEW ENGLAND INC — $25,500 · OtherCONCERNED ADVOCATES OF NEW ENGLAND INC+28 more — $48,362 · Other+28 moreTrustees of Tufts College — $120,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts Col…+1 more — $650 · EducationTailored For Success Inc — $115,650 · Human ServicesTailored For Success …+2 more — $1,950 · Human ServicesBROOKSBY VILLAGE INC — $7,240 · Housing & ShelterCITIZENS INN INC — $2,150 · Housing & ShelterMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,100 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,200 · InternationalMARCH OF DIMES INC — $1,400 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,200 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $975 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $635 · HealthMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,200 · Philanthropy
Other$365,062Education$120,650Human Services$117,600Housing & Shelter$9,390International$5,300Health$4,210Philanthropy$1,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTailored For Success Inc — $115,650 over 4y, 42% of budgetBROOKSBY VILLAGE INC — $7,240 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS INN INC — $2,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOFAR INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $975 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARTER CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND — $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $635 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College
  • Who funds Tailored For Success Inc
  • Who funds BROOKSBY VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds CITIZENS INN INC
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds COFAR INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds CARTER CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization George Mavridis Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Citizens Inn Inc18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Perkins School for the Blind7% of income from government
  • Brooksby Village Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George Mavridis Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to George Mavridis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph