Skip to content

· Private foundation

George H Eddings Sr and Alfreda R Eddings Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2019
19
Grants FY2019
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$8kInternational$7kHuman Services$7kArts & Culture$4kFood & Nutrition$1kEducation$700Youth Development$600Public Benefit$400Other$0
02FY2019 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$212k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA RABIDA CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$2,000
SHRINE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL$2,000
ANN and JOHN LURIE CHILDREN$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,500
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN$1,000
SALVATION ARMY OF CHICAGO$1,000
CARTER CENTER$1,000
BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER$1,000
MERCY SHIPS$1,000
EASTER SEALS$500
CARE$200
SOLES FOR SOULS$200
SAVE THE CHILDREN$100
TUSKEGEE AIRMEN$100
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE CHILDRENS HOME AID: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
TN
SC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13k · 10 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
32

Total granted

$13k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+41%

Still filing today

80%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +38%
  • LR
    La Rabida Children's Hospital
    2× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +44%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • MA
    MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TA
    THE AFRICIAN AMERICAN MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $637 · revenue +145%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
8
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
9
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
10
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paralyzed Veterans of America Vaughan Chapter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRINE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $2,000 · OtherSHRINE'S CHILDREN HOSPITALANN and JOHN LURIE CHILDREN: $2,000 · OtherANN and JOHN LURIE CHILDRENMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $1,100 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTEREASTER SEALS INC: $1,100 · OtherEASTER SEALS INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $1,100 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE AFRICIAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $1,100 · OtherTHE AFRICIAN AMERICAN MUSEUMNATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN: $1,000 · OtherNATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICANSALVATION ARMY OF CHICAGO: $1,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF CHICAGOPACIFIC GARDEN MISSION: $700 · Other+27 more: $5,425 · Other+27 moreTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $3,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA…Mercy Ships International: $1,300 · InternationalMercy Ships InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $800 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE A…+2 more: $200 · InternationalLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $2,200 · HealthLa Rabida Chil…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $637 · HealthST JUDE CHILDR…American Heart Association Inc: $600 · HealthAmerican Heart…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 · Health+2 more: $200 · HealthBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMONTFORD POINT MARINE ASSOCIATION: $300 · Public BenefitPUSH FOR EXCELLENCE INC: $300 · Community ImprovementCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $100 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$16,525International$7,300Health$3,837Arts & Culture$1,000Public Benefit$300Community Improvement$300Human Services$100Food & Nutrition$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $637 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUSH FOR EXCELLENCE INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA VAUGHAN CHAPTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTFORD POINT MARINE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PUSH FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George H Eddings Sr and Alfreda R Eddings Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George H Eddings Sr and Alfreda R Eddings Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George H Eddings Sr and Alfreda R Eddings’ filings →

More from the funding graph