· Private foundation
George F Moss Foundation Trust Xxxxx7001
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Afar Inc | $1,300,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $60,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC | $40,000 |
| Milwaukee Rescue Mission | $25,000 |
| Walter Schroeder Aquatic Center Ltd | $20,000 |
| HUNGER TASK FORCE INC | $15,000 |
| WELLPOINT CARE NETWORK | $10,000 |
| EINSTEIN PROJECT | $9,720 |
| HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF | $8,240 |
| KATHYS HOUSE INC | $7,500 |
| BEYOND VISION INC | $5,000 |
| EX FABULA INC | $5,000 |
| SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| VIVENT HEALTH INC | $5,000 |
| Ray of Hope for Ovarian Cancer Cure Inc | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWALTER SCHROEDER AQUATIC CENTER LTD4× · 2022–2025 · $64k · revenue +50%
VISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +25%
THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $35k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- LCLAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +34%
- YOYMCA OF THE GREATER WAUKESHA COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $25k
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…
The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…
The wisconsin council of the blind and visually impaired's mission is to promote the dignity and empowerment of people in wisconsin who are blind and visually impaired by providing services, advocating legislation, and educating the…
To enhance opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) to participate fully in their community as valued neighbors, productive workers and respected citizens. portal, inc. assists more than 200 adults…
To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…
The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…
The wcmp will grow and nurture the mep's impact in the state of wisconsin by engaging and aligning the best possible resources to help small and medium-sized manufacturers reach their potential.
To lead wisconsin in development and retention of science and tech-based businesses and to provide policy guidance to lawmakers, the governor of wisconsin, state agencies, and other institutions.
Milwaukee careers cooperative is a non profit employment agency that provides unique employment services, such as education, placement & transportation to assist individuals to obtain and maintain employment. milwaukee careers cooperative…
The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Street Angels Inc and the most unlike its peers is Operaton Warm - Wi. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AFAR INC DBA THE ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SCIMITAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WALTER SCHROEDER AQUATIC CENTER LTD ↗
- Who funds VISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE COUNTRY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds STREET ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds SKI FOR LIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds WELLPOINT CARE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds EINSTEIN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Kathy's House Inc ↗
- Who funds BADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds BEYOND VISION INC ↗
- Who funds SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds National Society of Black Engineers ↗
- Who funds EX FABULA INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATON WARM - WI ↗
- Who funds ADOPTION CHOICE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · The Ros Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Wispact Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation Inc · Francie Luke Silverman Foundation Under the F Silverman Charitable Tr · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Youth Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George F Moss Foundation Trust Xxxxx7001 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to George F Moss Foundation Trust Xxxxx7001?
Find your warmest path to George F Moss Foundation Trust Xxxxx7001 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.