Skip to content

· Private foundation

George E Stifel Scholarship Fund

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$124k
Granted FY2026still arriving
30
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Education$1.1MRecreation & Sports$30kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k29 grants · $113k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$11,250
ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY$7,000
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY$6,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$6,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$6,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$6,000
WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$5,250
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$5,000
PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN UNIVERSITY$5,000
WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$5,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $5k → 16%DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $6k → 11%ITHACA COLLEGE: $6k → 16%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $8k → 15%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%DENISON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%THE OGLEBAY FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%FAIRMONT STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%DAVIS AND ELKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF: $5k → 20%BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $5k → 16%DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $6k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $7k → 15%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%DENISON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%WHEELING UNIVERSITY: $8k → 15%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $5k → 15%DENISON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%WHEELING UNIVERSITY: $8k → 15%WHEELING UNIVERSITY: $8k → 15%WHEELING UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%WHEELING UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $9k → 11%WHEELING UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $8k → 11%WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $8k → 11%ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $8k → 15%ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $7k → 15%WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
KY
WV
VA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of George E Stifel Scholarship Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 71% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 59%.

George E Stifel Scholarship Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 26 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2026, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+6%

Still filing today

46%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
    5× · 2017–2026 · $36k · revenue +29%
  • XU
    XAVIER UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $36k · revenue +13%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • OF
    OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +48%
  • IC
    ITHACA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue -9%
  • PP
    POINT PARK UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
10
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Oglebay Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $496,550 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITYWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $121,500 · OtherWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITYWHEELING UNIVERSITY: $42,000 · Other+17 more: $190,250 · Other+17 moreDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $36,000 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF …XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $36,000 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $34,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURG…DENISON UNIVERSITY: $30,500 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITYUniversity of Miami: $19,500 · EducationUniversity of MiamiBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $14,500 · EducationBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSI…BETHANY COLLEGE: $14,500 · EducationBETHANY COLLEGERensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $12,000 · EducationWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $11,500 · Education+6 more: $27,000 · Education+6 moreOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$850,300Education$236,000Recreation & Sports$29,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $36,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $34,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $30,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALDERSON BROADDUS UNIVERSITY INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColumbia College Chicago: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds POINT PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALDERSON BROADDUS UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Columbia College Chicago ↗
  • Who funds STETSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George E Stifel Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George E Stifel Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Stetson University Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George E Stifel Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph