Skip to content

· Private foundation

George C Perreault Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$97kHealth$70kAnimals$31kEducation$11kPhilanthropy$10kReligion$7kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,770
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
SARASOTA WAVE YOUGH SPORTS FDN$25,000
FACE AUTISM$20,000
CARDINAL MOONEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$10,770
ANIMAL WEALFARE LEAGUE OF CHARLOTTE CO$10,000
CCJFA$5,000
RHS FOOTBALL BOOSTERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAFE CHILDRENS COALITION: $1k → 9%SAFE CHILDRENS COALITION: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 4 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$143k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+201%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FACE AUTISM INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue -5%
  • SW
    SARASOTA WAVE YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $61k · revenue -100%
  • C
    CCJFA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • UF
    UC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SL
    SATCHELS LAST RESORTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +201%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SARASOTA WAVE YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $60,889 · OtherSARASOTA WAVE YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSARASOTA WAVE YOUGH SPORTS FDN: $25,000 · OtherSARASOTA WAVE YOUGH SPORTS FDNIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUC FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherUC FOUNDATIONCARDINAL MOONEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $10,770 · OtherCCJFA: $10,000 · OtherANIMAL WEALFARE LEAGUE OF CHARLOTTE CO: $10,000 · OtherSUNCOAST YOUTH BASKETBALL NOMADS INC: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $6,592 · OtherFACE AUTISM INC: $70,000 · HealthFACE AUTISM INCSATCHELS LAST RESORT: $20,300 · AnimalsHumane Society of Sarasota County Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesRHS Football Booster Corporation: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$233,251Health$70,000Animals$21,300Human Services$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFACE AUTISM INC: $70,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetSATCHELS LAST RESORT: $20,300 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Sarasota County Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRHS Football Booster Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FACE AUTISM INC ↗
  • Who funds SARASOTA WAVE YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SATCHELS LAST RESORT ↗
  • Who funds SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Sarasota County Inc ↗
  • Who funds RHS Football Booster Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Tarr Charitable Family Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George C Perreault Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George C Perreault Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Safe Children Coalition Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George C Perreault’s filings →

More from the funding graph