Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2018
3
Grants FY2018
3
Organizations funded FY2018
67%
First-time grantees FY2018
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2018
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$3,005
Organizations funded a year
3 to 7
FY2017 to FY2018
States reached, FY2018
1
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2018, 67% of the organizations George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton funded were first-time grantees, receiving 57% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20183$7k67%
FY20177$15kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Education$10kHuman Services$4kHealth$3kPhilanthropy$3kHousing & Shelter$3kYouth Development$2k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($5k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton with peer funders

About George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton

How much does George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton give?
George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton reported 3 grants totaling $7,005 in its FY2018 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 7 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2018.
What does George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2018, its largest causes are Education (41%), Human Services (16%), Health (12%).
Who are George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2018: York College of Pennsylvania ($8k), Crispus Attucks Association of York Pa ($3k), YMCA of the Roses ($2k).
Does George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton fund new organizations?
In FY2018, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, Network for Good, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton based?
George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George and Dianne Thornton Private Foundation C/O Dianne Thornton’s filings →

More from the funding graph