Skip to content

New Jersey · Private foundation

George and Diana Allen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
23
Itemized grants FY2025
9
Organizations funded FY2023
89%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$76k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$750
Largest grant, FY2025
$40,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 23
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2025
8
Total assets, FY2025
$560k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 89% of the organizations George and Diana Allen Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’23
Public Safety & DisasterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving18$36k61%
FY20239$53k89%
FY201823$22k65%
FY201721$8kn/a
88% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$101kHealth$19kReligion$14kHuman Services$10kEducation$4kAnimals$3kInternational$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

Plus 37 recipients with no EIN on record ($93k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget George and Diana Allen Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Valley Hospital Foundation Inc: $11,929 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIntercollegiate Studies Institute Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish National Fund-Usa Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRamapo-Bergen Animal Refuge Inc: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGary Sinise Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Seeing Eye Inc: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSemper Fi & America's Fund: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Louisiana Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPaws for Purple Hearts: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGuide Dog Foundation for the Blind Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTri-Boro Food Pantry: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $26 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare George and Diana Allen Family Foundation with peer funders

About George and Diana Allen Family Foundation

How much does George and Diana Allen Family Foundation give?
George and Diana Allen Family Foundation reported 23 itemized grants totaling $76,004, out of $83,064 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 23 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does George and Diana Allen Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (15%), Health (3%), Religion (2%).
Who are George and Diana Allen Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Valley Hospital Foundation Inc ($12k), Chabad Shul of Closter Inc ($5k), Intercollegiate Studies Institute Inc ($3k).
Does George and Diana Allen Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 89% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does George and Diana Allen Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as George and Diana Allen Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is George and Diana Allen Family Foundation based?
George and Diana Allen Family Foundation is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George and Diana Allen Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph