Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George and Diana Allen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of GEORGE AND DIANA ALLEN FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 23 grants below total $76,004 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $83,064 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,060 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$750
Median grant
8
States reached
$560k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Federation of Northern NJ$40,000
The Valley Hospital Foundation$10,000
Chabad Shul of Closter$5,000
JFCS of Northern NJ$5,000
JFCS of Northern NJ$3,000
Jewish Home Foundation$2,500
St. Jude Hospital for Children$2,000
The Wheelchair Foundation$1,800
Intercollegiate Studies Institute$1,000
Jewish Community Center Northern NJ$1,000
Shriners Children Florida Fnd$1,000
Jewish National Fund USA$750
Ramapo Bergen Animal Refuge$500
Gary Sinise Foundation$500
Jewish National Fund USA$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25k · 11 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
33

Total granted

$25k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+56%

Still filing today

55%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’23’25
AnimalsHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +157%
  • IS
    INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +10%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $900 · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • JF
    Jewish Federation Donor Fund
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • JF
    Jewish Federation of NJ
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • JC
    Jewish Community Center of N NJ
    one grant, 2018 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
Veterinarians Without Borders Usa

Our mission is to strengthen animal health and welfare to build more resilient communities. we do this by enhancing veterinary care, bolstering community disaster response and recovery, championing sustainable livelihoods, and improving…

International
5
America's Vetdogs the Veterans K-9 Corps Inc

To assist disabled veterans, active military personnel, first responders with disabilities, and those who have served our country honorably to live with dignity and independence. america's vetdogs trains and places guide dogs for…

Public Benefit
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
8
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
9
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
10
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
11
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
12
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tri-Boro Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Jewish Federation Donor Fund — $25,000 · OtherJewish Federation Donor FundJewish Federation of NJ — $12,962 · OtherJewish Federation of NJJFCS of Northern NJ — $8,000 · OtherJFCS of Northern NJCHABAD SHUL OF CLOSTER INC — $5,200 · OtherCHABAD SHUL OF CLOSTER INCJewish Home Foundation — $4,300 · OtherJewish Home Foundation+39 more — $19,231 · Other+39 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $63,070 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $11,929 · Health+1 more — $250 · HealthINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC — $3,000 · EducationTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $900 · AnimalsRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC — $800 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INC — $250 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc — $200 · AnimalsJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC — $1,250 · InternationalCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $400 · Food & NutritionTRI-BORO FOOD PANTRY — $50 · Food & Nutrition
Other$74,693Philanthropy$63,570Health$12,179Education$3,000Animals$2,150International$1,250Food & Nutrition$450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $63,070 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $11,929 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-BORO FOOD PANTRY — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $26 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC
  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds RAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INC
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph