Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gendron Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Youth Development$185kHealth$125kEducation$8kHuman Services$6kRecreation & Sports$3k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH (AMFAR)$60,000
YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION$50,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR$25,000
MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY SUPPORT FOUNDATION$5,000
SAMUEL FULLER SCHOOL$2,700
TREMONT ADVENT CHRISTIAN CAMPMEETING ASSOCIATION INC$2,558
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION: $60k → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 3 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$275k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+27%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $115k
  • YV
    YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $110k · revenue -47%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -33%
  • RS
    RYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • TL
    THE LAMPLIGHTER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southeast Indiana Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one mentoring relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

Youth Development
2
Big Brothers-Big Sisters of Metropolitan Chicago

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.

—
3
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Manitowoc County Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong, enduring, professionally supported one on one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

—
4
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Texas Inc

To help children reach their potential through professionally supported one-to-one relationships with measurable impact.

—
5
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah

Big brothers big sisters of utah's vision is that all children achieve success in life. our mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Education
6
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
7
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Long Island Inc

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
8
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

Youth Development
9
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mississippi

Big brothers big sisters of mississippi previously recruited adults to work with children one-on-one and act as their mentor. these volunteers were supervised by trained professionals who assess the growth & development of the children.

—
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Southern Adirondacks Inc

Provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

Youth Development
11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
12
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mid-Maine

Role models (bigs) in one-to-one friendships in seven counties throughout Eastern, Coastal, and Central Maine. They partner with parents, in conjunction with over 30 schools and hundreds of volunteers and generous partners in our community…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Eastern Massachusetts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ryan Seacrest Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH (AMFAR): $115,000 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH (AMFAR)BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $25,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS…+2 more: $3,158 · OtherYOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG …RYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LAMPLIGHTER SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationSamuel Fuller School Inc: $2,700 · EducationMASSACHUSETTS MILITARY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Other$143,158Human Services$110,500Youth Development$50,000Philanthropy$10,000Education$7,700Public Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LAMPLIGHTER SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS MILITARY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSamuel Fuller School Inc: $2,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gendron Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gendron Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gendron Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Gendron Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gendron Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph