Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gelles Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$149kReligion$78kEducation$51kInternational$38kPhilanthropy$13kCivil Rights$4kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$182k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hebrew Senior Care$10,000
BIRTHRIGHT Israel Foundation$3,600
Jewish Family Service$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,800
American Jewish Committee$1,800
New England Jewish Academy$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%On Your Mark Inc: $1k → 11%On Your Mark inc: $1k → 11%On Your Mark Inc: $1k → 11%on Your Mark Inc: $1k → 11%Jewish Family Service: $2k → 11%Jewish Family Service: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$235k · 12 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$235k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+19%

Still filing today

58%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HEBREW HOME & HOSPITAL
    6× · 2018–2025 · $145k · revenue +47%
  • SS
    SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER HARTFORD INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +43%
  • OY
    ON YOUR MARK INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • CO
    Chabad of Greater Hartfoed
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • OL
    OPERATION LIFESHIELD INC
    one grant, 2024 · $23k · revenue 0%
  • SS
    Soloman Schechter Day School
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish High School of Connecticut

The jewish high school of connecticut is dedicated to educate jewish youth for whom jewish values and traditions shape and guide their lives and for whom learning and responsible actions are foundational for achievement.

2
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

5
Yeshiva Gedolah Rabbinical Institute of New England Inc

Operates a high school with 60 students and a junior rabbinical college with 60 students.

6
Jerusalem University College

Jerusalem University College creates opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge of God and His Word through immersive study of the ancient and modern contexts of Israel and the surrounding regions, equipping them for academia,…

International
7
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
8
Yeshiva Har Torah

A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

9
Yeshivas Ohr Yissochor Academy Inc

To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
10
University of Judaism Foundation
11
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
12
New England Hebrew Academy

Religious and secular education provided for preschool through high school

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford and the most unlike its peers is Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEBREW HOME & HOSPITAL — $145,250 · HealthHEBREW HOME & HOSPITALChabad of Greater Hartfoed — $35,000 · OtherChabad of Greater HartfoedChabad of Greater Hartford — $27,500 · OtherChabad of Greater HartfordSoloman Schechter Day School — $10,000 · OtherSoloman Schechter Day SchoolAmerican Friends of Shalva — $7,500 · OtherAmerican Friends of ShalvaCOLEL CHABAD — $7,000 · OtherCOLEL CHABADTZIVOS HASHEM — $6,600 · OtherTZIVOS HASHEMBAR ILAN UNIVERSITY IN ISRAEL INC — $5,000 · Other+6 more — $15,595 · Other+6 moreSOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER HARTFORD INC — $20,000 · EducationSOLOMON S…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationAMERICAN …NEW ENGLAND JEWISH ACADEMY — $2,800 · EducationNEW ENGLA…WESTCHESTER HEBREW HIGH SCHOOL — $2,500 · EducationWESTCHEST…OPERATION LIFESHIELD INC — $23,000 · InternationalOPERATION…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $7,200 · InternationalBIRTHRIGH…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCenter for Entrepreneurial Jewish Philanthropy Inc — $2,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesON YOUR MARK INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $3,600 · Civil Rights
Health$145,250Other$114,195Education$30,300International$30,200Philanthropy$12,500Human Services$8,000Civil Rights$3,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEBREW HOME & HOSPITAL — $145,250 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetOPERATION LIFESHIELD INC — $23,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER HARTFORD INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $7,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAR ILAN UNIVERSITY IN ISRAEL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE INC — $4,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetON YOUR MARK INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bess and Paul Sigel Hebrew Academy — $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ENGLAND JEWISH ACADEMY — $2,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louis & Martha Silver Foundation IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louis & Martha Silver Foundation Inc · Driesman Krichavsky Charitable Foundation Trust · Greenberg Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford · The Auerbach Schiro Foundation · Clsj Foundation Inc · Cheryl Chase & Stuart Bear Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Hartford Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gelles Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Solomon Schechter Day School of Greater Hartford Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gelles Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gelles Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph