Skip to content
Geile Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Geile Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$199kHousing & Shelter$189kFood & Nutrition$92kHealth$75kCrime & Legal$72kEducation$57kYouth Development$47kRecreation & Sports$41kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $109k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$422k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVIC$20,500
HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF NORTHERN ARIZO$18,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHERN AR$15,000
FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER$15,000
VICTIM WITNESS SERVICES COCONINO CO$10,000
FLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES$10,000
POORE MEDICAL CLINIC$10,000
NORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER$10,000
LOWELL OBSERVATORY$5,000
LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF COCONINO COU$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FLAGSTA$5,000
THE FOSTER ALLIANCE$4,550
THE PEACEFUL REVOLUTION PROJECT$3,490
FLAGSTAFF HOOPS$3,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $1k → 11%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $1k → 11%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE TEAMS OF FLAGS: $2k → 16%OCJ KIDS: $500 → 11%OCJ KIDS: $500 → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVIC: $21k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVIC: $15k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVIC: $15k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVIC: $15k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVIC: $15k → 16%VICTIM WITNESS SERVICES COCONINO CO: $14k → 16%VICTIM WITNESS SERVICES COCONINO CO: $10k → 16%VICTIM WITNESS SERVICES COCONINO CO: $10k → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CA: $10k → 16%VICTIM WITNESS SERVICES COCONINO CO: $10k → 16%VICTIM WITNESS SERVICES COCONINO CO: $6k → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CA: $5k → 16%VICTIM WITNESS SERVICES COCONINO: $5k → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CA: $5k → 16%NORTHLAND HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CA: $5k → 16%QUALITY CONNECTIONS: $2k → 16%FLAGSTAFF YOUTH RIDERS: $2k → 16%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $2k → 16%HOZHONI FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%HOZHONI FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $1k → 16%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $1k → 16%FLAGSTAFF YOUTH RIDERS FLYRS: $1k → 16%FLAGSTAFF YOUTH RIDERS: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$702k · 43 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
35

Total granted

$702k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+31%

Still filing today

47%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $84k · revenue +12%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $81k · revenue +34%
  • NF
    NORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERV
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY NEWMAN CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • PM
    POORE MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
2
Our Family Services Inc

Our Family's mission is to eliminate homelessness and strengthen our community. We do this by providing stability in times of crisis, linking people to support and resources, supporting social connectedness, engaging our neighbors to…

—
3
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
4
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
5
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
6
Arizona's Children Association

The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.

Human Services
7
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
8
Family Promise - Greater Phoenix

Enable families on the precipice of homelessness, or currently experiencing homelessness, to sustain or gain employment, independent housing and self-sufficiency.

Religion
9
Azcend

AZCEND nourishes minds and bodies so that neighbors in need experience a brighter future.

Human Services
10
Arizona Faith and Families

It is the mission of Arizona Faith and Families to recruit foster and adoptive parents from within the Christian church, to train and license them within a biblical world view, and to equip them to serve their Savior, home, church, and…

Human Services
11
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
12
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foster Alliance; the most unlike its peers is A New Dawn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
24/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER: $83,710 · OtherFLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTERHOUSING SOLUTIONS OF NORTHERN ARIZO: $56,000 · OtherHOUSING SOLUTIONS OF NORTHERN ARIZOFLAGSTAFF HOOPS INC: $32,000 · OtherFLAGSTAFF HOOPS INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHERN AR: $28,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHERN ARLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF COCONINO COU: $27,500 · OtherLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF COCONINO COUHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NIRTHERN AR: $20,203 · Other+61 more: $214,575 · Other+61 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $80,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMU…Victim Witness Services For Coconino County: $54,400 · Human ServicesVictim Witness Services …NORTHLAND HOSPICE: $25,000 · Human ServicesNORTHLAND HOSPICE+8 more: $19,500 · Human Services+8 moreNORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER: $60,750 · Crime & LegalFLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE POORE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $25,000 · HealthDOWN SYNDROME NETWORK INC DBA DSNetwork: $1,000 · HealthTynkertopia Inc: $9,000 · EducationTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $4,550 · EducationPINE FOREST FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · EducationSunshine Rescue Mission: $8,772 · ReligionDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $5,728 · Religion
Other$461,988Human Services$179,400Crime & Legal$60,750Housing & Shelter$60,000Health$26,000Education$17,550Religion$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER: $83,710 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $80,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER: $60,750 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVictim Witness Services For Coconino County: $54,400 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE POORE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $25,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetNORTHLAND HOSPICE: $25,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FLAGSTAFF: $15,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTynkertopia Inc: $9,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetGRAND CANYON YOUTH INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSunshine Rescue Mission: $8,772 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN AZ RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: $7,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetLOWELL OBSERVATORY: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANEW LIVING INC: $6,375 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $5,728 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTerra BIRDS: $5,570 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $4,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPINE FOREST FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFlagstaff Youth Riders Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetQuality Connections Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEncircle Families: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE TEAMS OF FLAGSTAFF: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHOZHONI FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Youth Connection Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOVER THE RAINBOW BUTTERFLY GARDEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCJ KIDS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNCJW (ARIZONA SECTION) INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCandelen Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME NETWORK INC DBA DSNetwork: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCare 4 the Caregivers: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SENIOR LIVING: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDNA PEOPLES LEGAL SERVICES INC: $475 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Victim Witness Services For Coconino County ↗
  • Who funds THE POORE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND HOSPICE ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FLAGSTAFF ↗
  • Who funds Tynkertopia Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CANYON YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Sunshine Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN AZ RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds LOWELL OBSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds ANEW LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds Terra BIRDS ↗
  • Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
  • Who funds PINE FOREST FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Molly and Joseph Herm…United Way of Norther…Geofamily FoundationHealth First Foundati…The Narbha Institute …Forest Highlands Foun…Monica Heaney Nackard…The Hs Lopez Family F…The Diane and Bruce H…Burton Family Foundat…Virginia G Piper Char…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ61.3× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Molly and Joseph Herman Foundation · United Way of Northern Arizona Inc · Geofamily Foundation · Health First Foundation-Northern Arizona · The Narbha Institute Inc · Forest Highlands Foundation · Monica Heaney Nackard Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Geile Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Geile Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Geile Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Geile Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Geile’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home