Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gedale B & Barbara S Horowitz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$626k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.3MArts & Culture$486kReligion$436kHealth$295kPhilanthropy$209kFood & Nutrition$40kHuman Services$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $526k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEHIGH UNIVERSITY$206,400
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$120,000
BARNARD COLLEGE$90,000
THE NEW MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$60,000
NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
THE UNITED SYNAGOGUE OF CONSERVATIVE JUDAISM$33,000
UJA-FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$30,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK$10,000
COLUMBIA BARNARD HILLEL$10,000
NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY$5,000
FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATIONS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION$5,000
HARVARD HILLEL$5,000
HARVARD COLLEGE$1,000
ISLAND HARVEST$300
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $300 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 23 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
3

Total granted

$4.6M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-11%

Still filing today

48%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +60%
  • LU
    LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +69%
  • NM
    New Museum of Contemporary Art
    9× · 2017–2025 · $409k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • JL
    JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS
    one grant, 2018 · $360 · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
9
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Educational Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Innovations in Medical Education - Co Betty Kerpen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BARNARD COLLEGE: $1,780,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGELEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $1,112,400 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITYICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $120,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL: $208,001 · OtherCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOLCOLUMBIA COLLEGE FUND: $125,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA COLLEGE FUN…UNITED SYNAGOGUE OF CONSERVATIVE JUDAISM: $102,000 · OtherUNITED SYNAGOGUE OF …JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF NY: $89,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY REL…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $80,000 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEALTEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK: $64,200 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF GRE…EMORY LAW SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherEMORY LAW SCHOOLJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $50,000 · OtherJEWISH THEOLOGICAL S…THE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $30,000 · Other+7 more: $54,261 · Other+7 moreNew Museum of Contemporary Art: $409,265 · Arts & CultureNew Museum …STATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureSTATUE OF L…NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $172,500 · Health+2 more: $7,000 · HealthUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $120,000 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $70,000 · ReligionHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $29,000 · Religion+1 more: $360 · ReligionNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $40,000 · Food & NutritionISLAND HARVEST LTD: $300 · Human Services
Education$3,012,400Other$852,462Arts & Culture$484,265Health$179,500Philanthropy$120,000Religion$99,360Food & Nutrition$40,000Human Services$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $1,780,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $1,112,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art: $409,265 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $172,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $120,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $29,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INNOVATIONS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION - CO BETTY KERPEN: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds STATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATIONS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION - CO BETTY KERPEN ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gedale B & Barbara S Horowitz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gedale B & Barbara S Horowitz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gedale B & Barbara S Horowitz Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gedale B & Barbara S Horowitz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gedale B & Barbara S Horowitz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph