Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gbrg Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$294k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$2.3MEducation$1.6MRecreation & Sports$1.3MInternational$1.0MPhilanthropy$772kHealth$591kYouth Development$449kHuman Services$372kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $447k
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.3M
$62,680
Median grant
5
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC$293,900
PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES$270,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC$250,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC$250,000
METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY$250,000
SAUL MIROWITZ JEWISH COMMUNITY SCHOOL$100,000
CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC$70,400
NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC$62,680
JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA$62,000
Individual grant recipient$51,666
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
CAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS$50,000
NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC$17,020
YESHIVAT HESDER NETIV TEFAHOT$9,000
LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC$55
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $250k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $250k → 20%ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES: $39k → 14%PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $250k → 20%ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES: $33k → 14%PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 7%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $250k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
MD
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 19 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
38

Total granted

$4.9M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+23%

Still filing today

47%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $520k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +253%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $750k · revenue +20%
  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $256k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $449k · revenue +179%
  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2020 · $300k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC
    one grant, 2021 · $186k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
2
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah

To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
3
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
6
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
7
The Academy for Jewish Religion

The academy for jewish religion serves the needs of the jewish people by ordaining rabbis and cantors and training leaders. we affirm our commitment to a vibrant and inclusive jewish pluralism; to an interweaving of sacred texts, critical…

—
8
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
9
Yeshivas Ohr Yissochor Academy Inc

To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
10
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
11
Hitmasrut Inc

Jewish educational programs

Religion
12
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Names Not Numbers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
24/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $1,036,017 · OtherNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INCUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $818,100 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISMPARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $520,000 · OtherPARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIESJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $303,824 · OtherJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICACITY OF HOPE: $300,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPE+37 more: $1,658,020 · Other+37 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $750,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIEN…METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $250,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN N…ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES: $71,969 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION OF…PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $672,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FED…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $250,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL END…HEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyLAMDEINU INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNAMES NOT NUMBERS INC: $448,750 · EducationNAMES NOT NU…ASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES INC: $255,629 · EducationASSOCIATION …SAUL MIROWITZ JEWISH SCHOOL: $100,000 · EducationSAUL MIROWIT…ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationKOHELET YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $37,500 · Education+3 more: $51,243 · Education+3 moreFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $448,635 · Youth DevelopmentB'NAI BRITH MEN'S CAMP ASSOCIATION: $95,860 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $186,150 · InternationalBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $75,000 · ReligionTHE HOFFBERGER INSTITUTE FOR TEXT STUDY INC D/B/A ALEPH BETA: $57,500 · ReligionBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $25,000 · Religion
Other$4,635,961Human Services$1,121,969Philanthropy$1,077,000Education$943,122Youth Development$544,495International$186,150Religion$157,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $1,036,017 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $750,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $672,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAMES NOT NUMBERS INC: $448,750 over 2y, 36% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $448,635 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES INC: $255,629 over 2y, 15% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $186,150 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSAUL MIROWITZ JEWISH SCHOOL: $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetB'NAI BRITH MEN'S CAMP ASSOCIATION: $95,860 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJEP CONGREGATION OF LONG ISLAND: $75,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES: $71,969 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC: $70,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HOFFBERGER INSTITUTE FOR TEXT STUDY INC D/B/A ALEPH BETA: $57,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC: $55,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetJEWISH CAMP AND CONFERENCE SERVICE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMDEINU INC: $50,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRobert M Beren Academy: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKOHELET YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $37,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRELIGIOUS ZIONISTS OF AMERICA MIZRACHI HAPOEL HAMIZRACHI INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetHAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLS: $16,243 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC: $13,045 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC: $8,332 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ahba IncNY30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ahba Inc · Iimi Inc · Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Hlmh Inc · Clrc Inc · Oclo Inc · Jlrj Inc · Ylry Inc · Pbhp Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gbrg Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gbrg Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • B'nai Brith Men's Camp Association: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gbrg Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gbrg Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gbrg’s filings →

More from the funding graph