· Private foundation
Gateway Fund 7522-Xxxxxx00049
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k48 grants · $201k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $287k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SE LAND TRUST OF NH | $32,500 |
| BERWICK ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| PORTSMOUTH MUSIC AND ART CENTER | $25,000 |
| LAND TRUST ALLIANCE | $25,000 |
| NH DEMOCRACY FUND | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| ALBANY ACADEMY FOR GIRLS | $13,000 |
| E N HUYCK PRESERVE | $13,000 |
| YMCA CAMP BELKNAP | $13,000 |
| CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE MUSIC HALL | $10,000 |
| NH PROJECT LEARNING TREE | $10,000 |
| TUCKERNUCK LAND TRUST | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
62 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YCYMCA CAMP BELKNAP INC4× · 2021–2025 · $251k · revenue +55%
- LTLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +45%
- FFFRIENDS FOREVER9× · 2017–2025 · $188k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- TATHE ALBANY ACADEMIES INCone grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +16%
- UNUVA NURSING SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $10k
- SASCENIC AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +111%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.
Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.
Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.
Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…
Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…
To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.
To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire and the most unlike its peers is GreenWood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YMCA CAMP BELKNAP INC ↗
- Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS FOREVER ↗
- Who funds COTTONWOOD GULCH EXPEDITIONS ↗
- Who funds BERWICK ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds STRAWBERY BANKE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds TUCKERNUCK LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of The Music Hall ↗
- Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds PORTSMOUTH MUSIC & ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN REACH - ENCOURAGING GROWTH THROUGH THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds Northern Forest Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ALBANY ACADEMIES INC ↗
- Who funds CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds SEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE QUEBEC-LABRADOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD ↗
- Who funds BARRETT EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds EO WILSON BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · French Fdn Tr Udecl · The Compass Fund · The Schleyer Foundation · A Caring Community Inc · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Davis Conservation Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Foundation for Seacoast Health · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gateway Fund 7522-Xxxxxx00049 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vermont Land Trust Inc — 42% of income from government
- Samaritans Inc — 31% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gateway Fund 7522-Xxxxxx00049?
Find your warmest path to Gateway Fund 7522-Xxxxxx00049 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.