Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Gary and Vivienne Player Foundation

To support initiatives aimed at providing underprivileged and vulnerable children in impoverished communities with a safe and nurturing environment in which to thrive.

$828k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$220k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Human Services$1.0MHealth$527kYouth Development$513kEducation$400kRecreation & Sports$195kHousing & Shelter$132k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $720k
$150,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELEVATE AUGUSTA$220,000
Family Reach$200,000
Foundcare Inc$150,000
Place of Hope$150,000
Elevate USA$42,500
Gantry Group$25,000
PENN MEDICINE$25,000
AIM FOR THE HANDICAPPED$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STAND UP AND PLAY FOUNDATION: $35k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE: $225k → 11%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $300k → 22%Place of Hope: $150k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE: $150k → 11%Place of Hope: $150k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 5 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$1.6M
$674k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-15%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $393k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PLACE OF HOPE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $675k · revenue -2%
  • EA
    ELEVATE AUGUSTA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $470k · 61% of their budget
  • GF
    GANTRY FOUNDATION KRISTI GUBLER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $225k · revenue -31% · 52% of their budget

Funded once

  • EC
    Episcopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -3%
  • CF
    COLLEGE FOR KIDS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -15%
  • HD
    HOPE & DOOR
    one grant, 2023 · $132k · revenue -20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

2
The Achievable Foundation

Achievable health's mission is to provide high-quality healthcare to our community, with a specialty in treating individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families.

Human Services
3
Families Usa Foundation Inc

Our vision is a nation where the best health and health care are equally accessible and affordable to all.

Human Services
4
Reach Healthcare

Reach healthcare's (reach) mission is to improve the overall healthcare experience for both patients and care providers and provide cost-effective solutions for payers. reach is focused on creating sustainable, large-scale improvements in…

Public Benefit
5
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health
6
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
7
Step-Up Incorporated

We provide comprehensive care and resources for wellness with dignity and inclusivity.

Health
8
Lift Inc

Lift's mission is to break the cycle of poverty by investing in parents. we build families' well-being, financial strength, and social connections to lift two generations at once.

Employment
9
Purpose Built Families Foundation Inc

Purpose Built Families Foundation is a nationally-accredited 501c3 nonprofit that delivers compassionate, client-centered, trauma-informed care to address underlying causes of poverty, homelessness, addiction, and suicide.

10
Vitalant Foundation

Vitalant foundation secures and stewards charitable gifts to support vitalant's mission to unite blood and biologics donors, talent and innovation to save and improve lives.

Health
11
Poise Foundation

Poise amplifies the power of black communities to fuel transformative change and uplift pathways to self-determination and shared success.

Philanthropy
12
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Episcopal Community Services of the Diocese of Pennsylvania and the most unlike its peers is Gantry Foundation Kristi Gubler. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ELEVATE AUGUSTA INC — $470,000 · EducationELEVATE AUGUSTA INCGANTRY FOUNDATION KRISTI GUBLER — $224,601 · EducationGANTRY FOUNDATION KRISTI GUBLERTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $151,725 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIACOLLEGE FOR KIDS INC — $150,000 · EducationCOLLEGE FOR KIDS INCELEVATE USA — $42,500 · EducationPLACE OF HOPE INC — $675,000 · Human ServicesPLACE OF HOPE INCEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania — $300,000 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Community Services of The Dioc…STAND UP AND PLAY FOUNDATION INC — $34,950 · Human ServicesFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION — $200,000 · HealthFAMILY REACH F…FOUNDCARE INC — $150,000 · HealthFOUNDCARE INCGOOD SPORTS — $195,000 · OtherGOOD SPOR…The David Yarrow Family Found — $27,315 · OtherThe David…AIM INC DBA AIM FOR THE HANDICAPPED — $20,000 · OtherAIM INC D…HOPE & DOOR — $131,650 · Housing & ShelterNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation — $30,000 · Philanthropy
Education$1,038,826Human Services$1,009,950Health$350,000Other$242,315Housing & Shelter$131,650Philanthropy$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC — $675,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetELEVATE AUGUSTA INC — $470,000 over 2y, 61% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania — $300,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGANTRY FOUNDATION KRISTI GUBLER — $224,601 over 4y, 52% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $151,725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR KIDS INC — $150,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetHOPE & DOOR — $131,650 over 1y, 22% of budgetSTAND UP AND PLAY FOUNDATION INC — $34,950 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAIM INC DBA AIM FOR THE HANDICAPPED — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gary and Vivienne Player Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Foundcare Inc6% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gary and Vivienne Player Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gary and Vivienne Player Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph