Skip to content

· Public charity

Garrison Area Improvement Association

To aid, assist, encourage, & promote development & expansion of business concerns in the area by making plant or other facilities available.

$597k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$107k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$314kRecreation & Sports$174kArts & Culture$96kReligion$44kFood & Nutrition$40kHousing & Shelter$36kEducation$30kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $430,715, the rows itemized in this filing. The $596,762 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $166,047 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $168k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARRISON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORP$107,075
Individual grant recipient$61,134
Individual grant recipient$39,006
NORTH DAKOTA PARKS & RECREATION$30,630
NORTH DAKOTA FIREFIGHTERS MUSEUM$29,944
Individual grant recipient$26,541
Individual grant recipient$20,000
GARRISON RURAL FIRE DISTRICT$20,000
DICKENS VILLAGE FESTIVAL$18,895
ND GOVERNORS WALLEYE CUP$10,150
GARRISON ALL SCHOOL REUNION$10,000
RIVERDALE AMBULANCE SERVICE$10,000
GARRISON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$6,340
GARRISON AREA RESOURCE CENTER$6,000
GARRISON HEATING & AIR LLC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WEST RIVER TRANSIT: $5k → 10%WEST RIVER TRANSIT: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$910k · 16 repeat orgs$433k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
43

Total granted

$910k
$363k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
0%

Still filing today

31%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2025 · $189k
  • GC
    GARRISON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $178k
  • ND
    NORTH DAKOTA FIREFIGHTERS MUSEUM
    7× · 2017–2025 · $144k

Funded once

  • ST
    STONES THROW ROADHOUSE
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • F
    FORESOME
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • BL
    BETTER LIVING FOR GARRISON INC
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -25% · 31% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Garretson Volunteer Fire Department

The Garretson Volunteer Fire Department serves the City of Garretson and surrounding communities in Eastern South Dakota. The Department is made up completely of volunteer fireman and is responsible for roughly 100 square miles within its…

Public Safety & Disaster
2
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
3
Ramona Volunteer Fire Department
Public Safety & Disaster
4
Waubay Senior Citizens Association

Gathering location for the community and the senior citizens of waubay south dakota

Human Services
5
Bowdon Development Center

To promote the bowdon community and it's assets.

Recreation & Sports
6
Garretson Community Ambulance Corp

Ambulance service for the rural community.

Health
7
Minnewaukan Rural Fire Protection District

To provide emergency services to minnewaukan, brinsmade, and all residents/non-residents residing or passing through the minnewakan rural fire protection district. these services include: fire control & suppression, assisting ems, search &…

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Wabeno Area Players
Arts & Culture
9
Garrison Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire and medical emergency services for the city of garrison, tx and the surrounding districts.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Gregory Area Healthcare System & Foundation

To preserve and promote the healthcare needs of the people and citizenry of the "rosebud area" which is generally that area within a 50 mile radius of the city of gregory, south dakota and particulary to insure that the rural healthcare…

Education
11
Garrison Area Caregivers Inc

Charitable organization - food shelf

Human Services
12
North Dakota Rural Health Association

Info & advocacy for rural health in nd

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dickens Village Festival; the most unlike its peers is Sakakawea Fence Strechers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $189,388 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGARRISON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORP: $177,575 · OtherGARRISON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPNORTH DAKOTA FIREFIGHTERS MUSEUM: $144,428 · OtherNORTH DAKOTA FIREFIGHTERS MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $83,455 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTH DAKOTA PARKS & RECREATION: $59,230 · Other+55 more: $551,353 · Other+55 moreDICKENS VILLAGE FESTIVAL: $39,195 · Recreation & SportsSAKAKAWEA FENCE STRECHERS INC: $5,300 · Recreation & SportsBETTER LIVING FOR GARRISON INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterGARRISON AREA RESOURCE CENTER & FOOD PANTRY: $26,530 · Food & NutritionRIVERDALE AMBULANCE SERVICE: $26,500 · HealthWEST RIVER TRANSIT: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$1,205,429Recreation & Sports$44,495Housing & Shelter$30,000Food & Nutrition$26,530Health$26,500Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDICKENS VILLAGE FESTIVAL: $39,195 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetSAKAKAWEA AREA COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $34,580 over 3y, 19% of budgetBETTER LIVING FOR GARRISON INC: $30,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetGARRISON AREA RESOURCE CENTER & FOOD PANTRY: $26,530 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetRIVERDALE AMBULANCE SERVICE: $26,500 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetBENEDICTINE LIVING COMMUNITIES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST RIVER TRANSIT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DICKENS VILLAGE FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds SAKAKAWEA AREA COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds BETTER LIVING FOR GARRISON INC ↗
  • Who funds GARRISON AREA RESOURCE CENTER & FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds RIVERDALE AMBULANCE SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds BENEDICTINE LIVING COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ND GOVERNORS WALLEYE CUP ↗
  • Who funds WEST RIVER TRANSIT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ichf FoundationND13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ichf Foundation · Inspiritus Community Health Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Garrison Area Improvement Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Garrison Area Improvement Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Garrison Area Improvement Association?

    Find your warmest path to Garrison Area Improvement Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Garrison Area Improvement Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph