· Public charity
Garrison Area Improvement Association
To aid, assist, encourage, & promote development & expansion of business concerns in the area by making plant or other facilities available.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 32 grants below total $360,161 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $634,187 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $274,026 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $139k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $147k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $76,754 |
| GARRISON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORP | $70,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $24,149 |
| NORTH DAKOTA PARKS & RECREATION | $19,300 |
| RIVERDALE GOLF CLUB | $10,000 |
| DICKENS VILLAGE FESTIVAL | $10,000 |
| GARRISON ALL SCHOOL REUNION | $10,000 |
| LENORES OUTDOORS AND CATERING | $9,308 |
| AMERICAN LEGION BASEBALL | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,465 |
| ST PAULS LUTHERAN CHURCH | $6,084 |
| WOUNDED WARRIORS IN ACTION | $6,000 |
| PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH | $5,500 |
| RIVERDALE AMBULANCE SERVICE | $5,500 |
| GARRISON CHURCH OF GOD | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $208k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2021–2024 · $128k
- NDNORTH DAKOTA FIREFIGHTERS MUSEUM6× · 2017–2022 · $114k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2023–2024 · $44k
Funded once
- STSTONES THROW ROADHOUSEone grant, 2018 · $40k
- FFORESOMEone grant, 2023 · $30k
- BLBETTER LIVING FOR GARRISON INCone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -25% · 31% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Garretson Volunteer Fire Department serves the City of Garretson and surrounding communities in Eastern South Dakota. The Department is made up completely of volunteer fireman and is responsible for roughly 100 square miles within its…
To provide professional, compassionate, and quality health care to the communities we service in a safe and efficient manner. to meet and exceed current local, state, and national standards to provide the highest possible standard of…
To provide emergency services to minnewaukan, brinsmade, and all residents/non-residents residing or passing through the minnewakan rural fire protection district. these services include: fire control & suppression, assisting ems, search &…
To provide fire and medical emergency services for the city of garrison, tx and the surrounding districts.
Charitable organization - food shelf
We provide services to the poor and people who have emergencies we provide food clothings and household supplies all our services are free
To preserve and promote the healthcare needs of the people and citizenry of the "rosebud area" which is generally that area within a 50 mile radius of the city of gregory, south dakota and particulary to insure that the rural healthcare…
Ambulance service for the rural community.
To promote the bowdon community and it's assets.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dickens Village Festival and the most unlike its peers is Sakakawea Fence Strechers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ichf Foundation · Inspiritus Community Health Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Garrison Area Improvement Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Garrison Area Improvement Association?
Find your warmest path to Garrison Area Improvement Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.