Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gallagher Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$114kEducation$83kReligion$50kPublic Benefit$8kHuman Services$6kHealth$5kPhilanthropy$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$732k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$25,000
ST MARY STAR OF THE SEA CHURCH$5,600
RICHARD AND FLORENCE FRIDL FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP-UNIV OF DAYTON$5,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$5,000
ST JOSEPH CONGREGATION$3,500
ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE$2,000
WISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION$1,520
MARTY O'CONNOR FOUNDATION FOR PROGRESS$1,500
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
A HOUSE IN AUSTIN$1,000
JOURNEY HOUSE FOUNDATION$1,000
AFJHAR$1,000
BALLPARK DAY OF FAITH$1,000
ST FRANCIS DESALES SEMINARY$1,000
DIOCESE OF VENICE$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOURNEY HOUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE CENTER FOR FAMILY LEARNING AND YOUTH ATHLETICS: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 26 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
11

Total granted

$158k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+5%

Still filing today

38%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +24%
  • AH
    A HOUSE IN AUSTIN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +72%
  • WISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • TF
    TAILS FOR LIFE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +32%
  • Children First Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Mercy Home for Children Inc

Mercy home provides essential services for children and adults with developmental disabilities. mercy home's mission is to ensure the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities through the recognition of each person's…

—
6
University of Mary

The University of Mary exists to serve the religious, academic and cultural needs of the people in this region and beyond.(Continued on Schedule O)

Education
7
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
8
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
9
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
10
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
11
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
12
The Guest House of Milwaukee Inc

Guest House of Milwaukee provides a full continuum of services to individuals and families experiencing homelessness or at risk of losing housing. Guest House serves more than 2,000 individuals annually through emergency shelter, housing,…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Journey House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac: $112,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacMarquette University: $30,400 · EducationMarquette UniversityA HOUSE IN AUSTIN: $12,500 · EducationA HOUSE IN AUSTIN+1 more: $500 · EducationRICHARD AND FLORENCE FRIDL FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP-UNIV OF DAYTON: $27,000 · OtherRICHARD AND FLORENCE FRIDL FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP-…CURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE: $14,900 · OtherCURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE O…ST JOSEPHS CONGREGATION: $10,500 · OtherST JOSEPHS CONGREGATIONST MARY STAR OF THE SEA CHURCH: $8,450 · OtherST MARY STAR OF THE SEA CHURCHMARTY O'CONNOR FOUNDATION FOR PROGRESS: $7,500 · OtherMARTY O'CONNOR FOUNDATION FOR PROGRESSCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $7,000 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5,950 · OtherJOURNEY HOUSE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherBALLPARK DAY OF FAITH: $4,500 · Other+20 more: $23,570 · Other+20 moreSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · HealthEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthWOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $1,700 · PhilanthropyFLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS FOUNDATION INC: $250 · PhilanthropyMOVING MOUNTAINS ADAPTIVE PROGRAM: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsTAILS FOR LIFE INC: $1,000 · AnimalsJOURNEY HOUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $500 · Human Services
Education$155,400Other$114,370Health$3,600Philanthropy$1,950Recreation & Sports$1,000Animals$1,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $112,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University: $30,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA HOUSE IN AUSTIN: $12,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetWISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION INC: $2,520 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $1,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMOVING MOUNTAINS ADAPTIVE PROGRAM: $1,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTAILS FOR LIFE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMacCANON BROWN HOMELESS SANCTUARY INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSIONARIES OF THE LITURGY: $600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren First Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds A HOUSE IN AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVING MOUNTAINS ADAPTIVE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds TAILS FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds MacCANON BROWN HOMELESS SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONARIES OF THE LITURGY ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Children First Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Joseph F & Catherine M Bennett Family Foundation · Susan and Leander Jennings Foundati · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Zurn Foundation Inc (Fka Rexnord Foundation Inc) · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gallagher Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gallagher Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Children First Inc: 100% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gallagher’s filings →

More from the funding graph