Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gallagher Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Recreation & Sports$114kEducation$83kReligion$50kPublic Benefit$8kHuman Services$6kHealth$5kPhilanthropy$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$732k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$25,000
ST MARY STAR OF THE SEA CHURCH$5,600
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$5,000
RICHARD AND FLORENCE FRIDL FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP-UNIV OF DAYTON$5,000
ST JOSEPH CONGREGATION$3,500
ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE$2,000
WISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION$1,520
MARTY O'CONNOR FOUNDATION FOR PROGRESS$1,500
A HOUSE IN AUSTIN$1,000
BALLPARK DAY OF FAITH$1,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
AFJHAR$1,000
JOURNEY HOUSE FOUNDATION$1,000
ST FRANCIS DESALES SEMINARY$1,000
DIOCESE OF VENICE$750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOURNEY HOUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE CENTER FOR FAMILY LEARNING AND YOUTH ATHLETICS: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$158k · 26 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
11

Total granted

$158k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+5%

Still filing today

38%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +24%
  • AH
    A HOUSE IN AUSTIN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +72%
  • WISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TF
    TAILS FOR LIFE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +32%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • Children First Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Mercy Home for Children Inc

Mercy home provides essential services for children and adults with developmental disabilities. mercy home's mission is to ensure the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities through the recognition of each person's…

6
University of Mary

The University of Mary exists to serve the religious, academic and cultural needs of the people in this region and beyond.(Continued on Schedule O)

Education
7
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
8
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
9
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
10
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
11
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
12
The Guest House of Milwaukee Inc

Guest House of Milwaukee provides a full continuum of services to individuals and families experiencing homelessness or at risk of losing housing. Guest House serves more than 2,000 individuals annually through emergency shelter, housing,…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Journey House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Homeless Services & ShelterCommunity Health CentersCancer Support OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceChild and Family ServicesAnimal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr13%66%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac — $112,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacMarquette University — $30,400 · EducationMarquette UniversityA HOUSE IN AUSTIN — $12,500 · EducationA HOUSE IN AUSTIN+1 more — $500 · EducationRICHARD AND FLORENCE FRIDL FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP-UNIV OF DAYTON — $27,000 · OtherRICHARD AND FLORENCE FRIDL FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP-…CURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE — $14,900 · OtherCURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE O…ST JOSEPHS CONGREGATION — $10,500 · OtherST JOSEPHS CONGREGATIONST MARY STAR OF THE SEA CHURCH — $8,450 · OtherST MARY STAR OF THE SEA CHURCHMARTY O'CONNOR FOUNDATION FOR PROGRESS — $7,500 · OtherMARTY O'CONNOR FOUNDATION FOR PROGRESSCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $7,000 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL — $5,950 · OtherJOURNEY HOUSE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherBALLPARK DAY OF FAITH — $4,500 · Other+20 more — $23,570 · Other+20 moreSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · HealthEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthWOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $1,700 · PhilanthropyFLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS FOUNDATION INC — $250 · PhilanthropyMOVING MOUNTAINS ADAPTIVE PROGRAM — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsTAILS FOR LIFE INC — $1,000 · AnimalsJOURNEY HOUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INC — $500 · Human Services
Education$155,400Other$114,370Health$3,600Philanthropy$1,950Recreation & Sports$1,000Animals$1,000Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $112,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University — $30,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA HOUSE IN AUSTIN — $12,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetWISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION INC — $2,520 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $1,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMOVING MOUNTAINS ADAPTIVE PROGRAM — $1,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTAILS FOR LIFE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMacCANON BROWN HOMELESS SANCTUARY INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSIONARIES OF THE LITURGY — $600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren First Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds A HOUSE IN AUSTIN
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds MOVING MOUNTAINS ADAPTIVE PROGRAM
  • Who funds TAILS FOR LIFE INC
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY
  • Who funds MacCANON BROWN HOMELESS SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds MISSIONARIES OF THE LITURGY
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds Children First Inc
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Joseph F & Catherine M Bennett Family Foundation · Susan and Leander Jennings Foundati · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Zurn Foundation Inc (Fka Rexnord Foundation Inc) · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gallagher Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 100%
  • Children First Inc100% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph