Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gabus Family Foundation II

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$110kHealth$10kPublic Benefit$4k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$306k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC$5,000
RYTHYMS OF GRACE$3,700
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC$3,500
FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE$3,500
ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC$3,200
FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE$3,000
ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC$3,000
RYTHYMS OF GRACE$3,000
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC$2,800
BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE$2,500
SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC$1,500
BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE: $6k → 11%RYTHYMS OF GRACE: $4k → 5%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $4k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 13%MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE: $3k → 11%RYTHYMS OF GRACE: $3k → 5%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $4k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 13%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE: $1k → 11%RYTHYMS OF GRACE: $3k → 5%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 13%BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE: $1k → 11%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $2k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 13%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $2k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $2k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $1k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $2k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $1k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $1k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $10k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $4k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $4k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $3k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $3k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $2k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $2k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $2k → 10%ANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 7 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$121k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+73%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +43%
  • FF
    FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +17%
  • AL
    ANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • MA
    MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +73%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Life Line

Animal rescue

Animals
2
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
3
Rags 2 Riches Animal Rescue

Animal rescue

Animals
4
Pets Without Parents Columbus

To be a resource as a no-kill pet rescue service

Animals
5
Animal Nation Inc

Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.

Animals
6
Animal Friends Rescue Project

The Organization is dedicated to finding life-long loving homes for stray, abandoned and abused cats and dogs. The Organization concentrates on networking with other animal welfare agencies in the county and throughout the state to provide…

Human Services
7
God's Dogs Rescue

Animal rescue

Human Services
8
Animal Relief Fund Inc

To provide care for animals that are abused and need homes

Animals
9
Animal Rescue Force Inc

Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.

Animals
10
Alive Rescue Nfp

Animal rescue and welfare.

Animals
11
Pug Rescue of Florida Inc

Rescue and placement of pug breed dogs

Animals
12
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Wildlife Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $29,000 · AnimalsFURRY FRIENDS REFUGEANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INC: $20,900 · AnimalsANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INCANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $16,800 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INCBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $10,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC+1 more: $1,700 · AnimalsSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $31,500 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION…RHYTHMS OF GRACE: $9,700 · HealthTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Public Benefit
Animals$78,400Youth Development$31,500Health$9,700Public Benefit$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $31,500 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetFURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $29,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INC: $20,900 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $16,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRHYTHMS OF GRACE: $9,700 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gabus Family Foundation II funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gabus Family Foundation II. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gabus Family Foundation II’s filings →

More from the funding graph