Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gabus Family Foundation II

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$110kHealth$10kPublic Benefit$4k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$306k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC$5,000
RYTHYMS OF GRACE$3,700
FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE$3,500
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC$3,500
ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC$3,200
RYTHYMS OF GRACE$3,000
FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE$3,000
ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC$3,000
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC$2,800
BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE$2,500
SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC$1,500
BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE: $6k → 11%RYTHYMS OF GRACE: $4k → 5%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $4k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 13%MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE: $3k → 11%RYTHYMS OF GRACE: $3k → 5%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $4k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 13%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE: $1k → 11%RYTHYMS OF GRACE: $3k → 5%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 13%BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE: $1k → 11%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $2k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 13%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $3k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $2k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $2k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $1k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%ANIMAL LIFE LINE OF IOWA INC: $2k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $1k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $1k → 10%SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $10k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $4k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $4k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $3k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $3k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $2k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $2k → 10%FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $2k → 10%ANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$121k · 7 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$121k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+73%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +43%
  • FF
    FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +17%
  • AL
    ANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • MA
    MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +73%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Life Line

Animal rescue

Animals
2
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
3
Rags 2 Riches Animal Rescue

Animal rescue

Animals
4
Pets Without Parents Columbus

To be a resource as a no-kill pet rescue service

Animals
5
Animal Nation Inc

Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.

Animals
6
Animal Friends Rescue Project

The Organization is dedicated to finding life-long loving homes for stray, abandoned and abused cats and dogs. The Organization concentrates on networking with other animal welfare agencies in the county and throughout the state to provide…

Human Services
7
God's Dogs Rescue

Animal rescue

Human Services
8
Animal Relief Fund Inc

To provide care for animals that are abused and need homes

Animals
9
Animal Rescue Force Inc

Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.

Animals
10
Alive Rescue Nfp

Animal rescue and welfare.

Animals
11
Pug Rescue of Florida Inc

Rescue and placement of pug breed dogs

Animals
12
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Wildlife Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE — $29,000 · AnimalsFURRY FRIENDS REFUGEANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INC — $20,900 · AnimalsANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INCANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC — $16,800 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INCBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $10,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC+1 more — $1,700 · AnimalsSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $31,500 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION…RHYTHMS OF GRACE — $9,700 · HealthTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $3,500 · Public Benefit
Animals$78,400Youth Development$31,500Health$9,700Public Benefit$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $31,500 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetFURRY FRIENDS REFUGE — $29,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL LIFELINE OF IOWA INC — $20,900 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC — $16,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRHYTHMS OF GRACE — $9,700 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gabus Family Foundation II funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph