Skip to content
Gabriele Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gabriele Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$21kEducation$20kHealth$18kEmployment$10kYouth Development$10kHuman Services$3k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CENTER FOR LOSS AND BEREAVEMENT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%STANDUPGIRLCOM FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34k · 3 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$34k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ORION COMMUNITIES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $16k · revenue +43%
  • LV
    LIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES
    2× · 2018–2023 · $10k · revenue +107%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR LOSS AND BEREAVEMENT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SF
    STANDUPGIRLCOM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • CC
    CHESTER COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTERS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
2
Opportunities Inc of Jefferson County

Opportunities, inc. of jefferson county provides services for individuals for the purpose of maximizing their success and enhancing their abilities to be independent, contributing members of the community.

—
3
Vocational Services Inc

Providing job opportunities for individuals with barriers to employment

—
4
Center for Living & Working Inc

We work to ensure that individuals with disabilities can live independently as equal members of society.

Human Services
5
Vocational Guidance Services

Creating pathways for individuals with disabilities to engage in the community, achieve greater independence, and attain employment.

Employment
6
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
7
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
8
Women of Tomorrow Mentor and Scholarship Program Greater Philadelphia

To inspire, motivate and empower at-risk young women to live up to their full potential through a unique mentoring program with highly accomplished professional women.

—
9
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
10
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
11
Goodwill Industries of Metropolitan Chicago Inc

Goodwill industries of metropolitan chicago, inc. ("goodwill-chicago") is a nonstock, not-for-profit illinois corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock,…

Human Services
12
Goodwill Industries of Greater New York & Northern New Jersey Inc

Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Loss and Bereavement; the most unlike its peers is Standupgirlcom Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHESTER COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTERS INC: $10,000 · EducationCHESTER COUNTY OPPORTUNITIE…WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $5,000 · EducationWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE T…MIGHTY WRITERS: $5,000 · EducationMIGHTY WRITERSORION COMMUNITIES INC: $16,400 · OtherORION COMMUNITIES INCWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $2,500 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTERSTANDUPGIRLCOM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSTANDUPGIRLCOM FOUND…FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS ASSOCIATION …LIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES: $10,000 · EmploymentLIGHTHOUSE VO…YOUNG LIFE: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFETHE CENTER FOR LOSS AND BEREAVEMENT: $7,500 · HealthTHE CENTER…
Education$20,000Other$18,900Human Services$15,000Employment$10,000Youth Development$10,000Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORION COMMUNITIES INC: $16,400 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSTANDUPGIRLCOM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR LOSS AND BEREAVEMENT: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMIGHTY WRITERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Quest for the BestVanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Quest for the BestPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Quest for the Best · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gabriele Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gabriele Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gabriele Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home