Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fund for the Arts

Accumulation of resources and funds from donors and allocating such funds in support of artistic and educational endeavors

$175k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$1.3M
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $138k
$12,719
Median grant
1
States reached
$340k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVAMPATO DISCOVERY MUSEUM - CLAY CENTER$48,515
WEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$33,647
CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON$16,238
CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC$13,331
CHARLESTON BALLET$13,313
WEST VIRGINIA YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$12,719
RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET$8,687
FRIENDS OF OLD TIME MUSIC$8,116
CHARLESTON CIVIC CHORUS$6,824
CHARLESTON CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY$6,824
WOMANSONG CHORALE$6,786
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET: $9k → 18%RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET: $8k → 18%RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET: $7k → 18%RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET: $7k → 18%RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET: $7k → 18%RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET: $7k → 18%RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET: $6k → 18%RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET: $4k → 18%KANAWHA PLAYERS THEATRE: $3k → 18%KANAWHA PLAYERS THEATRE: $2k → 18%AVAMPATO DISCOVERY MUSEUM - CLAY CENTER: $54k → 18%AVAMPATO DISCOVERY MUSEUM - CLAY CENTER: $54k → 18%AVAMPATO DISCOVERY MUSEUM - CLAY CENTER: $49k → 18%AVAMPATO DISCOVERY MUSEUM - CLAY CENTER: $49k → 18%AVAMPATO DISCOVERY MUSEUM - CLAY CENTER: $49k → 18%AVAMPATO DISCOVERY MUSEUM - CLAY CENTER: $49k → 18%AVAMPATO DISCOVERY MUSEUM - CLAY CENTER: $47k → 18%AVAMPATO DISCOVERY MUSEUM - CLAY CENTER: $41k → 18%CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $16k → 18%CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $15k → 18%CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $15k → 18%CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $15k → 18%CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $14k → 18%CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $14k → 18%CHARLESTON BALLET: $13k → 18%CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $13k → 18%CHARLESTON BALLET: $12k → 18%CHARLESTON BALLET: $12k → 18%CHARLESTON BALLET: $12k → 18%CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $12k → 18%CHARLESTON BALLET: $11k → 18%CHARLESTON BALLET: $11k → 18%CHARLESTON BALLET: $10k → 18%CHARLESTON BALLET: $10k → 18%KANAWHA PLAYERS: $3k → 18%CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC: $13k → 18%CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC: $13k → 18%CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC: $13k → 18%CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC: $13k → 18%CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC: $12k → 18%CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC: $12k → 18%CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC: $11k → 18%CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$1.3M
$0

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $393k · revenue +37%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $265k · revenue +0%
  • CT
    CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON
    8× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +201%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Concert Ballet of Virginia

    To present ballet/dance programs.

    Arts & Culture
    2
    Warminster Symphony Society

    Performs classical music for the community

    3
    Bach Society of Charleston

    Performing Public Concerts

    Arts & Culture
    4
    Rocky Mountain Ballet Theatre
    Arts & Culture
    5
    Chamber Music Society of Williamsburg

    To foster an appreciation for chamber music and other classical music and to enrich the cultural life of our community.

    6
    Columbus Cultural Youth Orchestra
    Arts & Culture
    7
    Charleston Youth Company Inc

    Encourage develop and utilize artistic t

    8
    Chamber Music Wilmington

    World class chamber music concerts in North Carolina

    Arts & Culture
    9
    Charlottesville Ballet

    To elevate the art of dance through wellness, performance, education, and community outreach

    Arts & Culture
    10
    Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

    The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

    Arts & Culture
    11
    Music Carolina

    To provide small ensemble chamber music perfs

    Arts & Culture
    12
    City Center Ballet Inc

    City Center Ballet is dedicated to realizing the full potential of ballet dancers through outstanding preparation in classical ballet and exceptional performance opportunities with professional dancers. Within the company and the…

    Arts & Culture

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charleston Ballet Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kanwaha Valley Friends of Old-Time Music and Dance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/9
    Grantees still filing
    6/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    CLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC — $392,662 · Arts & CultureCLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INCWEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $264,928 · Arts & CultureWEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCCHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON — $114,516 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTONCHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC — $96,369 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INCCHARLESTON BALLET INC — $91,130 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTON BALLET INCWEST VIRGINIA YOUTH SYMPHONY INC — $85,658 · Arts & CultureWEST VIRGINIA YOUTH SYMPHONY INCRIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET ENSEMBLE — $55,907 · Arts & CultureKANWAHA VALLEY FRIENDS OF OLD-TIME MUSIC AND DANCE — $50,137 · OtherKANWAHA VALLEY…WOMANSONG INC — $38,831 · OtherWOMANSONG INCCHARLESTON CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY INC — $32,717 · OtherCHARLESTON CHA…CHARLESTON CIVIC CHORUS INC — $32,406 · OtherCHARLESTON CIV…KANAWHA PLAYERS — $8,038 · Other
    Arts & Culture$1,101,170Other$162,129

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC — $392,662 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $264,928 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON — $114,516 over 8y, 17% of budgetCHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC — $96,369 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetCHARLESTON BALLET INC — $91,130 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA YOUTH SYMPHONY INC — $85,658 over 8y, 13% of budgetRIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET ENSEMBLE — $55,907 over 8y, 13% of budgetKANWAHA VALLEY FRIENDS OF OLD-TIME MUSIC AND DANCE — $50,137 over 8y, 21% of budgetKANAWHA PLAYERS — $8,038 over 3y, 23% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC
    • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON
    • Who funds CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA GUILD INC
    • Who funds CHARLESTON BALLET INC
    • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA YOUTH SYMPHONY INC
    • Who funds RIVER CITY YOUTH BALLET ENSEMBLE
    • Who funds KANWAHA VALLEY FRIENDS OF OLD-TIME MUSIC AND DANCE
    • Who funds KANAWHA PLAYERS

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Maier Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Fund for the Arts funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph