· Public charity
Fulton Education Foundation Inc
Fulton education foundation's mission is to engage all of fulton county in a positive partnership that enhances opportunities and educational outcomes for our school-aged children.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $2,452,152 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,786,619 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $334,467 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FULTON COUNTY SCHOOLS | $1,898,152 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT | $540,000 |
| EDUCATE THE CITY | $14,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +214% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $554k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FCFULTON COUNTY SCHOOLS4× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M
- RGREACH GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $162k · revenue +863%
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $24k · revenue +214%
Funded once
- GRGEORGIA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +67% · 79% of their budget
- TMTEACHING MUSEUM NORTH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $12k
- TSThe Summit Counseling Center Incone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The gordon youth science and technology center (gystc) is a regional center dedicated to promoting student interest and achievement in science and mathematics. we aim to stimulate a child's interest from an early age to enjoy, not fear,…
Public Charter School
Culture Shift, Inc focuses on providing tutoring, mentoring, and training to GA students and familes
The georgia prevention project is a large-scale prevention program aimed at reducing drug use through public service messaging, public policy, and community outreach. central to the program is a research-based marketing campaign that…
To provide educational and training opportunities for small business enterprises and emerging entrepreneurial in order to develop capacity that will drive business growth and create jobs.
Increase the stdent skills
To Provide Education to Public and Private Scools
The Gifted Education Foundation Corporation is a student training and developmental organization aiming to increase college access and career options for students who are products of Title I school districts across America.
The Scholarship Academy, Inc. (the Academy), founded in 2006, is a private District of Columbia nonprofit corporation dedicated to helping lowincome students secure resources to pursue higher education opportunities with minimum debt to…
Job Training for Teens
To provide leadership skills, training, career and technical instruction, and other educational opportunities. through this organization, students are afforded training and knowledge so that they may become productive citizens.
Richmont graduate university provides graduate education, integrating professional counseling, applied psychology, and practical theology for christ-centered transformation
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Summit Counseling Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Georgia ↗
- Who funds REACH GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIS 180 INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATE THE CITY INC ↗
- Who funds TEACHING MUSEUM NORTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Summit Counseling Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY FAMILY COUNSELING CENTERIN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fulton Education Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.